The Skyrme problem consists in minimizing the energy functional E(φ) := R 3 |∇φ| 2 + i =j |∂ i φ ∧ ∂ j φ)| 2 dx in the set of functions φ : R 3 → S 3 such that deg(φ) = 1 2 π 2 R 3 det(φ, ∇φ)dx = k ∈ Z, the infimum being denoted by I k . In [1,2] an existence result for minimizers of degree ±1 was proved by using the concentration-compactness method. But as Fanghua Lin and Yisong Yang have pointed out recently [4,5], the proof of the main result contained in [1, 2] is not correct. This Erratum announces that these proofs can be corrected by modifying the arguments used in [1,2]. The method used is still the concentration-compactness principle but applied in a different, and in some sense, less usual way. The new proof, in full detail, has been electronically posted [3].In a very interesting paper basically devoted to the study of the Faddeev knots ([4])(see also [5] in 2D), F. Lin and Y. Yang have proved recently the existence of 3D Skyrmions of degree ±1 by using a different approach, which is based on a cubic decomposition of the whole space. In that paper, they obtain a condition for the existence of solutions for the 3D Skyrme's problem consisting in a family of strict decomposition inequalities. By modifying the proofs in [1, 2] but still using the concentration-compactness approach, an existence result for minimizers of deg(φ) = ±1 can be established under the same conditions as in [4,5]. This is not surprising. Indeed, the above family of strict inequalities is not only sufficient for the existence of minimizers, but it is in fact necessary and sufficient for the relative compactness of all minimizing sequences. The precise statements of the main results are:Note that in [1,2] only binary decompositions (J = 2) had to be avoided. The difference lies in the fact that we do not know anymore whether for all ∈ Z \ {0, k}, the large inequalities I k ≤ I + I k− hold or not.