2005
DOI: 10.1504/ijex.2005.006430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exergy analysis of a two-stage refrigeration cycle using two natural substitutes of HCFC22

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that R507A is a better substitute to R502 than R404A. The efficiency defect in condenser is highest and lowest in liquid vapour heat exchanger for the refrigerants considered [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that R507A is a better substitute to R502 than R404A. The efficiency defect in condenser is highest and lowest in liquid vapour heat exchanger for the refrigerants considered [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Exergy Analysis method, when applied to two-stage vapour compression cycles, was intended to find the value of the intermediate pressure that maximises the COP of the cycle (Ouadha et al, 2005), basically in booster-type configurations, thus results of the exergy analysis of a two-stage refrigeration system operating between a constant evaporating temperature of -30°C and condensation temperatures of 30°C, 40°C, 50°C and 60°C with two natural substitutes of HCFC22, namely propane (R290) and ammonia (R717), as working fluids were presented. The study was performed theoretically on a cycle with an open heat exchanger (flash intercooling).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods *Correspondence to: Akhilesh Arora, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi College of Engineering, Delhi 110042, India. y E-mail: prof_akhilesh_arora@yahoo.co.in of selecting the inter-stage pressure exist in the literature [2]. Threlkeld [3] demonstrated that for two-stage refrigeration cycles, the optimum interstage pressure is much different than the geometric mean pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was revealed that this method gives better results than geometric mean method for evaluation of inter-stage temperature. Ouadha et al [2] carried out the exergy analysis of a twostage refrigeration cycle using ammonia and propane. They found that the optimum inter-stage pressure for a two-stage refrigeration system is very close to the saturation pressure corresponding to the arithmetical mean of the refrigerant condensation and evaporation temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%