2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exergoeconomic optimization and environmental analysis of a novel solar-trigeneration system for heating, cooling and power production purpose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 On the other hand, the exergy efficiency of the present system is not so high, and it is around 21%. This value is characterized as an intermediate value because there are studies with higher exergy efficiencies, 4,7,10,15 while there are studies with lower or similar exergy efficiency. 9,11,12 The reason for the higher exergy efficiency in other studies is the use of fossil fuel combined with solar energy, as well as the production of hydrogen as a useful output with high exergy factor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 On the other hand, the exergy efficiency of the present system is not so high, and it is around 21%. This value is characterized as an intermediate value because there are studies with higher exergy efficiencies, 4,7,10,15 while there are studies with lower or similar exergy efficiency. 9,11,12 The reason for the higher exergy efficiency in other studies is the use of fossil fuel combined with solar energy, as well as the production of hydrogen as a useful output with high exergy factor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system presents exergy efficiency up to 50% in the heating mode and up to 20% in the cooling mode, while it has a payback period of 5 years. Baghernejad et al examined the combination of PTC with gas turbine, and they found the maximum system exergy efficiency at 56%. Bellos and Tzivanidis investigated a trigeneration system based on an ORC with an ejector device, which presents 87% energy efficiency, 12% exergy efficiency, and a payback period of 5 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the exergy and energy efficiencies of the plant were 45.6 and 46.17%, respectively. In another research, a combined cooling, heating, and power generation plant was optimized and the cost of fuel, exergy destruction, and environmental effects were reduced by 24.17, 38.87 and 24.17%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simultaneous operation and planning of the MCE system is, therefore, required [1,8]. In order to find the optimal size of CHP and CCHP, a united optimization problem of planning and operation strategy is presented in [36][37][38]. Furthermore, operation and planning is carried out simultaneously in an EH system along with reliability constraints [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%