2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exergoeconomic and multi-objective optimization of a solar thermochemical hydrogen production plant with heat recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the service life of 20 years, the prime cost of the product is calculated as 5.795 USD/kg H 2 . Which is less than the price reported by Sayyaadi et al 21 The Levelized cost of the product is found to be 1.482 USD/kg H 2 which is close to Sadeghi et al 22 outcome.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Considering the service life of 20 years, the prime cost of the product is calculated as 5.795 USD/kg H 2 . Which is less than the price reported by Sayyaadi et al 21 The Levelized cost of the product is found to be 1.482 USD/kg H 2 which is close to Sadeghi et al 22 outcome.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For the multi‐objective optimization in this study, non‐dominated sorting genetic algorithm‐II (NSGA‐II) is a strong optimization algorithm is utilized to evaluate optimal input design parameters and outputs 54 . The Linear Programming Technique for Multidimensional Analysis of Preference (LINMAP) and The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods are used here to determine the optimal Pareto solution 55 . The exergy efficiency (Equation (17)) and unit product cost (Equation (56)) are the two objectives of optimization in this study.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the NSGA-II results, Jain et al found that the MOO was better than single-objective optimization for the optimization of the vapor absorption system . Sadeghi et al utilized NSGA-II for the optimization of the hydrogen production process, and the results stated that the exergy efficiency and the product cost of the optimal solution are 50.1% and $11.94/GJ, respectively . These studies provided the significance of MOO and the reliability of NSGA-II for an energy system…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Sadeghi et al utilized NSGA-II for the optimization of the hydrogen production process, and the results stated that the exergy efficiency and the product cost of the optimal solution are 50.1% and $11.94/GJ, respectively. 31 These studies provided the significance of MOO and the reliability of NSGA-II for an energy system. 32 In our previous work, 11 a cascade absorption refrigeration/ dehumidification system (CARDS) combining the ARS with the LDS has been proposed to recover the low-grade waste heat.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%