2017
DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exercise medicine for advanced prostate cancer

Abstract: Exercise oncology is rapidly evolving, with impressive possibilities that may directly improve patient outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Research must focus on translating preclinical trials into human clinical trials and investigate the direct effect of exercise on overall survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These are of clinical importance given that many mCRPC patients will develop or have bone metastatic lesions. Furthermore, the multimodal and modular components of the exercise prescription support the exercise intervention of a phase 3 trial in mCRPC, for which the primary outcome is overall survival ( 34 , 35 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are of clinical importance given that many mCRPC patients will develop or have bone metastatic lesions. Furthermore, the multimodal and modular components of the exercise prescription support the exercise intervention of a phase 3 trial in mCRPC, for which the primary outcome is overall survival ( 34 , 35 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of patients with bone metastases in exercise studies would have greatly increased the generalizability of results to all patients at this stage of disease. In addition, a number of exercise trials in advanced cancer did not specify whether patients with metastatic bone disease were included [117‐119] or specify the site of metastases [120]. Further detail regarding patients' disease status would enable clinicians to ascertain the applicability of study results to specific patient populations in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial 48 weeks of the programme (year 1) will be supervised in an exercise clinic setting, with a gradual tapered transition to self-management, and the subsequent 48 weeks of the programme (year 2) will be self-managed with one exercise visit required at the beginning of each cycle (every 4 weeks). This exercise prescription critically uses periodisation to maximise training stimulus and physiological adaptation while also reducing the risk of injury, overtraining or staleness, 11 26 autoregulation to allow patients with advanced mCRPC to self-determine their capabilities at each session collaboratively with the supervising clinical exercise physiologist, thereby lowering intensity or volume if the patient is fatigued or unwell, or raising intensity or volume if the patient is energetic and motivated. 11 26 Furthermore, the exercise programme will be modified for any patients with mCRPC with bone metastases depending on the size and location of metastases ( table 5 ), performed individually or in small groups (of up to 4–6 patients per session).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%