2018
DOI: 10.1080/08038740.2017.1395359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Excuse Me, But Are You Raping Me Now?” Discourse and Experience in (the Grey Areas of) Sexual Violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Sexual violence or rape is generally scripted as a concrete experience clearly distinguished from normative sexual practice (Gash and Harding 2018;Gunnarsson 2018;Hindes and Fileborn 2020;Jackson 1978). This has been demonstrated, for instance, in experimental studies where participants were asked to describe what they believed to be typical seduction/ hookup and rape scenarios (Anderson 2007;Krahé et al 2007;Littleton and Axsom 2003;Littleton et al 2009;Ryan 1988).…”
Section: "Real Rape"mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sexual violence or rape is generally scripted as a concrete experience clearly distinguished from normative sexual practice (Gash and Harding 2018;Gunnarsson 2018;Hindes and Fileborn 2020;Jackson 1978). This has been demonstrated, for instance, in experimental studies where participants were asked to describe what they believed to be typical seduction/ hookup and rape scenarios (Anderson 2007;Krahé et al 2007;Littleton and Axsom 2003;Littleton et al 2009;Ryan 1988).…”
Section: "Real Rape"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We additionally investigated potential differences in how observers made sense of this encounter between a man and woman or between two men. We use the term "grey area" to refer to the vignette in our study, not as a pre-categorization of the event, but to indicate our expectation that the described encounter resists easy categorization in current-day discourses about sex and violence (Gunnarsson 2018;Hindes and Fileborn 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an overall framework for understanding girls’ concerns about sexual activity, we find inspiration in the critical realist idea that there is an ontological dimension of experiences (objects of concern) which exceeds its discursive structuring. Thus, the object of moral judgements exists relatively independently of the judgements making these fallible (Gunnarsson, 2018; Sayer, 2004: 6). Thus, we may evaluate something as wrong at one point in time and then at another point evaluate it as acceptable.…”
Section: Dignity and The Dialectic Between Discourse And Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we may evaluate something as wrong at one point in time and then at another point evaluate it as acceptable. As Lena Gunnarsson (2018) has argued, our experiences are ontologically distinct from the discursive dimensions shaping these and this extra-discursive dimension may resist and shape discourses. Drawing on this philosophical understanding, we rely on two of Andrew Sayer’s concepts related to his theory of lay morality – moral sentiments and dignity (Sayer, 2004).…”
Section: Dignity and The Dialectic Between Discourse And Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En beslektet kritikk argumenterte for at offerfokuset bidro til en diskurs om kvinner som svake og voldtagbare, og at denne diskursen bidro til å gjøre voldtekt til et større og verre fenomen enn det var (Marcus, 1992). I dagens teoretiske landskap er det flere som forsøker å forene innsikter om språkets kategoriserende makt for handlingsalternativer og situerte kroppslige erfaringer (Alcoff, 2014;Gavey, 2005;Gunnarsson, 2018). I tråd med Linda Alcoff (2014) forstår vi erfaringer som både kroppslige og som formet av historiske forutsetninger og kulturelle forestillinger, og vi deler videre hennes konklusjon om at vi fortsatt trenger å lytte til ofres erfaringer.…”
Section: Teoretisk Rammeverkunclassified