Exclusions in social inclusion projects: Struggles in involving children in digital technology development

Abstract

While social inclusion projects have centred on digital technology for a long time now, they have remained silent about educating and empowering children to act as technology makers and shapers, not merely passive users. We have organized, together with children, digital technology projects that we now critically examine from the perspective of inclusion/exclusion. The paper shows that in social inclusion projects, there is exclusion taking place in a multitude of forms, shaped by a variety of rules and powers. We use nexus analysis as a theoretical and methodological tool that guides us to study inclusion/exclusion as processes, within which both discourses and concrete actions are to be acknowledged as well as historical and interactional aspects-both at individual level and at the level of social structures. Our study shows that inclusion and exclusion may be intentionally accomplished by children themselves, those may result without any intentional effort because of circumstances and those may also be done for children by various kinds of adults.Although children's empowerment and agency are significant, also adults play a decisive role. Implications for social inclusion and digital technology education research and practice are discussed. Nexus analysis is suggested as a useful means for revealing and managing the complexity involved in social inclusion/exclusion.

Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India

“…The students of today are not equally equipped with digital tools and equipments, and as such, there exists a digital divide ( Iivari et al, 2020 ). A number of extant researches have focused and examined on the digital divide that exists particularly related to the access of newer devices and technologies ( Srivastava and Shainesh, 2015 , Song et al, 2020 ), however for the young student population the understanding is very limited ( Iivari et al, 2018 , Mariën and Prodnik, 2014 ). In an Asian context, especially developing countries like India where the present study has been carried out, the digital divide can be very polarizing, especially in terms of the ownership of smartphones, tablet computers or laptops.…”

From Digital Divide to Social Inclusion: A Tale of Mobile Platform Empowerment in Rural Areas

“…The digital divide is defined as "the gap between individuals, households, businesses and geographic areas at different socio-economic levels with regard both to their opportunities to access ICTs and to their use of the Internet for a wide variety of activities" [6,29]. It can be broken down into three levels.…”

ISJ Editorial

“…The final paper in this special issue, by Iivari, Kinnula, Molin‐Juustila, and Kuure (), examines digital technology projects that educate and empower children. The authors contend that IS research should take children, along with their digital technology skills and competencies, into the focus of its study, as children will form the future IS workforce.…”