2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitatory binocular interactions in two cases of alternating strabismus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same method to assess severity of suppression, several laboratory studies reported a significant reduction in suppression in adults after repeated binocular game play and that the change in severity was correlated with the change in visual acuity. [6][7][8][9][10][11] On the other hand, Knox et al 12 reported results similar to the present study; there was no significant reduction in suppression with binocular treatment of amblyopic schoolchildren, and, although 50% of children had some reduction in severity of suppression, there was no significant correlation with visual acuity improvement. The discrepancies between adults and children may reflect the difficulty that children encounter in making global motion coherence judgments used to quantify severity of suppression, which may have introduced more variability for children than adults.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Using the same method to assess severity of suppression, several laboratory studies reported a significant reduction in suppression in adults after repeated binocular game play and that the change in severity was correlated with the change in visual acuity. [6][7][8][9][10][11] On the other hand, Knox et al 12 reported results similar to the present study; there was no significant reduction in suppression with binocular treatment of amblyopic schoolchildren, and, although 50% of children had some reduction in severity of suppression, there was no significant correlation with visual acuity improvement. The discrepancies between adults and children may reflect the difficulty that children encounter in making global motion coherence judgments used to quantify severity of suppression, which may have introduced more variability for children than adults.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…16 Prior studies using reduced fellow eye contrast to allow amblyopic adults to experience binocular vision in supervised laboratory training sessions have reported more visual acuity improvements than observed in the present study (0.17-0.26 logMAR over 1-9 weeks). [6][7][8][9][10][11] The greater improvements may have resulted from differences in attention or motivation due to the age of the participants and/or differences between the supervised laboratory vs home setting for treatment. In the present study, 24% of the amblyopic children enrolled had poor (r25%) compliance with the binocular iPad treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations