2007
DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e328011b89a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitation threshold of the motor cortex estimated with transcranial magnetic stimulation electroencephalography

Abstract: The excitation threshold of the human motor cortex was estimated on the basis of electroencephalographic responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. The hand area of the primary motor cortex was stimulated at 10 intensities, for seven healthy individuals. The four dominant peaks of the overall brain response could be reliably determined when stimulation was intense enough to induce a cortical electric field of approximately 33-44 mV/mm. This may be estimated as the threshold for evoking measurable b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though recent findings show that physiological responses can be obtained at stimulation intensities well below the motor threshold [17,49], higher intensities than the currently applied stimulation of 45% machine output which corresponds to~80% MT in the present sample, may have had more pronounced effects on mood and EEG ratios. However, findings from a recent study show that intensities as low as 60% MT are sufficient enough to evoke EEG responses in superficial nerve tissue of the primary motor cortex, suggesting that intensities well below the neural excitation threshold can have significant physiological effects [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though recent findings show that physiological responses can be obtained at stimulation intensities well below the motor threshold [17,49], higher intensities than the currently applied stimulation of 45% machine output which corresponds to~80% MT in the present sample, may have had more pronounced effects on mood and EEG ratios. However, findings from a recent study show that intensities as low as 60% MT are sufficient enough to evoke EEG responses in superficial nerve tissue of the primary motor cortex, suggesting that intensities well below the neural excitation threshold can have significant physiological effects [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, findings from a recent study show that intensities as low as 60% MT are sufficient enough to evoke EEG responses in superficial nerve tissue of the primary motor cortex, suggesting that intensities well below the neural excitation threshold can have significant physiological effects [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) TMS was delivered on the convexity of the middle caudal portion of the superior frontal gyrus close to the midline (Broadmann's areas 6), with the current perpendicular to its main axis. To ensure significant EEG responses (Casali et al, 2010;Komssi et al, 2007;Rosanova et al, 2009) intensity of TMS induced electric field was always 490 V/m as estimated by the NBS system, for each study participant. We delivered about 200-300 stimuli for each session at a frequency randomly jittered between 1.5 and 1.8 s (equivalent to about 0.5-0.6 Hz).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest EEG activity after TMS pulse occurs at about 100 ms (Bender et al, 2005;Bonato et al, 2006;Komssi et al, 2004Komssi et al, , 2007Paus et al, 2001). Several time-locked EEG responses have been found in association with single-pulse TMS of M1, viz., N15 (vertex-negative EEG deflection approximately 15 ms poststimulus), P30, N45, P55, N100, P180, and N280 (Bender et al, 2005;Komssi and Kähkönen, 2006;Komssi et al, 2002;Paus et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The origin of the TMS-evoked EEG deflections is unknown, except for the N45 response, which has been localized into the ipsilateral central sulcus (Paus et al, 2001). When motor cortex was stimulated by different stimulus intensities (20-120% of MT), the slopes of intensity-dependency varied depending on time after stimulation indicating that different neural processes are involved (Komssi et al, 2004(Komssi et al, , 2007. The negative peak about 100 ms after singlepulse TMS is one of the most prominent components in the EEG being visible even in single trials (Nikouline et al, 1999;Paus et al, 2001;Tiitinen et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%