2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of alcohol on TMS-evoked N100 responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reduction of the N100 amplitude has also been observed when the delivery of a TMS pulse over the M1 hand area is shortly (25 ms) preceded by a somatosensory stimulus applied to the contralateral hand (Bikmullina et al, 2009), in accord to short-latency afferent inhibition in MEP recordings (Tokimura et al, 2000). The N100 was almost abolished when the TMS coil is rotated by 90°relative to the optimal orientation (Bonato et al, 2006) and after alcohol ingestion (Kähkönen and Wilenius, 2007). Furthermore, the N100 amplitude was significantly increased after 1 Hz rTMS applied over M1 (Casula et al, 2014), and significantly correlated with the duration of the cortical silent period (Farzan et al, 2013), which is thought to reflect cortical inhibitory processes (see Section 2.2.3.…”
Section: Late Components Of Motor Cortex Tepsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A reduction of the N100 amplitude has also been observed when the delivery of a TMS pulse over the M1 hand area is shortly (25 ms) preceded by a somatosensory stimulus applied to the contralateral hand (Bikmullina et al, 2009), in accord to short-latency afferent inhibition in MEP recordings (Tokimura et al, 2000). The N100 was almost abolished when the TMS coil is rotated by 90°relative to the optimal orientation (Bonato et al, 2006) and after alcohol ingestion (Kähkönen and Wilenius, 2007). Furthermore, the N100 amplitude was significantly increased after 1 Hz rTMS applied over M1 (Casula et al, 2014), and significantly correlated with the duration of the cortical silent period (Farzan et al, 2013), which is thought to reflect cortical inhibitory processes (see Section 2.2.3.…”
Section: Late Components Of Motor Cortex Tepsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…N100, which is the dominant r nTMS-EEG Reproducibility r r 1393 r peak in TMS-evoked EEG, is very sensitive to small changes in cortical excitability. It may represent cortical inhibition elicited by TMS [Bender et al, 2005;Kähkö nen and Wilenius, 2007;Kičić et al, 2008;Nikulin et al, 2003]. The N100-P180 complex may contain an auditory response to the TMS coil click; part of this response is due to boneconducted sound [Nikouline et al, 1999].…”
Section: Reproducibility Of Eeg Deflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal evolution of TEPs over the scalp is thought to reflect the spread of activation from the stimulation site to other cortical areas through corticocortical fibers or subcortical structures. It provides information on the reactivity and connectivity of different cerebral cortex areas (Massimini et al, 2007;Paus et al, 2001;Taylor et al, 2008) and on how this reactivity might be modulated by extrinsic factors such as sleep deprivation or alcohol intake (Del Felice et al, 2011;Kähkönen and Wilenius, 2007). In the early stages of brain damage (e.g., ischemic lesions), this "perturbational approach" may be a powerful tool for exploring how affected brain areas might causally interact and how intra-cortical connections might be modu-lated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%