2018
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excision of the doubly methylated base N 4 ,5-dimethylcytosine from DNA by Escherichia coli Nei and Fpg proteins

Abstract: Cytosine (C) in DNA is often modified to 5-methylcytosine (mC) to execute important cellular functions. Despite the significance of mC for epigenetic regulation in mammals, damage to mC has received little attention. For instance, almost no studies exist on erroneous methylation of mC by alkylating agents to doubly or triply methylated bases. Owing to chemical evidence, and because many prokaryotes express methyltransferases able to convert mC into ,5-dimethylcytosine (mC) in DNA, m C is probably present We sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This resulted in an 11-nt incision product with an active glycosylase enzyme (see Figure 1A ). The DNA at the defined site, which contains m N 4 C and m N 4,5 C, was prepared as described previously by Alexeeva et al (2018) . The ss polydeoxyribonucleotide [Cy3] 5′-CCCTCGAT GTA[U]CATGGATCCGATCGATCC-3′ (Fw 30 nt; 11 nt incision product) containing uracil (U) at the specific site was annealed to equimolar amounts of the Rev strand with G opposite U, and used as a positive control substrate [for active enzyme, Fpg AP lyase activity, after incubation with uracil-DNA glycosylase (Ung)].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This resulted in an 11-nt incision product with an active glycosylase enzyme (see Figure 1A ). The DNA at the defined site, which contains m N 4 C and m N 4,5 C, was prepared as described previously by Alexeeva et al (2018) . The ss polydeoxyribonucleotide [Cy3] 5′-CCCTCGAT GTA[U]CATGGATCCGATCGATCC-3′ (Fw 30 nt; 11 nt incision product) containing uracil (U) at the specific site was annealed to equimolar amounts of the Rev strand with G opposite U, and used as a positive control substrate [for active enzyme, Fpg AP lyase activity, after incubation with uracil-DNA glycosylase (Ung)].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nakahara et al report is compounded by our recent discovery that the E. coli Fpg exhibits significant activity where N 4 ,5-dimethylcytosine (m N 4,5 C) placed opposite C or T is removed from DNA in vitro ( Alexeeva et al, 2018 ). The report and our discovery urged us to investigate in detail the ability of Fpg, and therefore the base excision repair (BER) pathway, to incise and repair C, including where methylated C is opposite C. We found that the enzyme exhibited activity for C⋅C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong AP site activity on both single and double-stranded DNA suggests that either the abasic site is a true substrate for NEIL2, the favored base modification substrate is as of yet unidentified, or sequence-context dependence for a particular lesion may exist. Indeed, it was recently shown that both EcoNei and Fpg will excise N4,5dimethylcytosine while leaving 5-methylcytosine and 4-methylcytosine uncut (42). Additionally, both NEIL1 and NEIL2 were shown to function in TDG-mediated turnover of 5hmC(11) at sites of TET dependent DNA demethylation while 5hmC accumulated at sites of DNA damage (43) and thus exhibit the ability to substitute for APE1 in the demethylation pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How are nucleic acid modifications introduced, how are they recognized or targeted, and to what extent are they heritable?-these are all burning issues in epigenetics at the moment. In this issue, Klimasˇauskas [2] describes studies with the doubly methylated base N 4 ,5-dimethylcytosine using enzymes from Escherichia coli, while the potential for epigenetic modifications to influence alternative splicing is reviewed by Koziol [3]. Gene-specific editing in vitro and in vivo is a hot topic, and the different methodologies available are compared by Rots [4].…”
Section: What Is Heritable and What Is Not?mentioning
confidence: 99%