2008
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.077719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchangeable Models of Complex Inherited Diseases

Abstract: A model of unlinked diallelic loci affecting the risk of a complex inherited disease is explored. The loci are equivalent in their effect on disease risk and are in Hardy-Weinberg and linkage equilibrium. The goal is to determine what assumptions about dependence of disease risk on genotype are consistent with data for diseases such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism, and multiple sclerosis that are relatively common (0.1-2% prevalence) and that have high concordance rates for monozygotic twins (30-50%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key feature of any multi-locus model for disease that affects only a small proportion of the population is a highly non-linear relationship between burden of disease alleles and risk of disease [15] . The liability threshold model is the simplest representation, as it depends on only two parameters: risk of disease in the population and the proportion of variance on the liability scale attributed to genetic factors; hence avoiding modelling individual loci by representing many genetic architectures in terms of number and frequency of risk loci that each could equate to explain the same total variance.…”
Section: Assumptions Of Polygenic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key feature of any multi-locus model for disease that affects only a small proportion of the population is a highly non-linear relationship between burden of disease alleles and risk of disease [15] . The liability threshold model is the simplest representation, as it depends on only two parameters: risk of disease in the population and the proportion of variance on the liability scale attributed to genetic factors; hence avoiding modelling individual loci by representing many genetic architectures in terms of number and frequency of risk loci that each could equate to explain the same total variance.…”
Section: Assumptions Of Polygenic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 This model assumes that there is an underlying unmeasured trait related to disease risk and that individuals are affected with disease only when the value of the trait exceeds a particular threshold. Under such a model, we discovered that the statistical power to detect risk variants is higher than the power to detect protective variants, even when they have the same effect size with respect to the underlying unmeasured trait.…”
Section: Significantly Higher Power To Detect Low-frequency Risk Varimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the prime indicates the risk in a relative with relationship R. Following the notation in a previous article (Slatkin 2008), the causative allele at each locus is denoted by 1 and the other allele is denoted by a -. The frequency of 1 at locus i is p i .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%