2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Excess of Risk-Increasing Low-Frequency Variants Can Be a Signal of Polygenic Inheritance in Complex Diseases

Abstract: In most complex diseases, much of the heritability remains unaccounted for by common variants. It has been postulated that lower-frequency variants contribute to the remaining heritability. Here, we describe a method to test for polygenic inheritance from lower-frequency variants by using GWAS summary association statistics. We explored scenarios with many causal low-frequency variants and showed that there is more power to detect risk variants than to detect protective variants, resulting in an increase in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a whole, we identified an enrichment of SCZD candidate genes in P1 compared with P2, which is in line with recent studies on SCZD, showing that affected individuals have increased burden of genetic variants [Ahn et al., ; Chan, et al. ; Kong et al., ]. These findings highlight the possible importance of these genes as modifiers of the mental illness phenotype seen in P1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As a whole, we identified an enrichment of SCZD candidate genes in P1 compared with P2, which is in line with recent studies on SCZD, showing that affected individuals have increased burden of genetic variants [Ahn et al., ; Chan, et al. ; Kong et al., ]. These findings highlight the possible importance of these genes as modifiers of the mental illness phenotype seen in P1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Because of allele frequency differences, number of SNPs, and inferred effect size differences along the frequency spectrum, the scale is orders of magnitude different between the true and inferred raw, unstandardized scores, cautioning that while they are informative on a relative scale ( Figures 5C and S11), their absolute scale should not be over interpreted. The inferred risk difference between populations is driven by the increased power to detect minor risk alleles rather than protective alleles in the study population, 93 given the differential selection of case and control subjects in the liability threshold model. We demonstrate this empirically in these neutral simulations within the European population ( Figure S14A), indicating that this phenomenon occurs even in the absence of population structure and when case and control cohort sizes are equal.…”
Section: Ancestry-specific Biases In Polygenic Risk Score Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in some diseases, splitting the cases into groups may not prove beneficial. Interrogation of GWAS data sets with GREML methods, 27 polygenic scoring, 30 and polygenic rare variant association methods, 34 as discussed above, may help to shed some light on this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Finally, polygenic rare variant analysis approaches can be used to identify disease groups that have a polygenic contribution from rare variants and can be used to identify disease subgroups. 34 These methods will be valuable for identifying the genetically distinct groups that would benefit from further association analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%