2019
DOI: 10.3390/ceramics2010010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange-Coupling Behavior in SrFe12O19/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 Nanocomposites

Abstract: Magnetically hard-soft (100-x) SrFe12O19–x wt % La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 nanocomposites were synthesized via a one-pot auto-combustion technique using nitrate salts followed by heat treatment in air at 950 °C. X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) were used to characterize the structural and magnetic properties of the samples. XRD spectra revealed the formation of a mixture of ferrite and magnetite phases without any trace of secondary phases in the comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the addition of a high content of YIG (x = 0.2 to 0.4), the values of H c and H n decrease, which is due to dipolar interaction rather than intergrain exchange interaction, which is similar to previous reports [15,16,31,32]. The exchange force interaction on the soft moments are weakened and the dipolar interaction amongst the soft grains becomes significant [33].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…With the addition of a high content of YIG (x = 0.2 to 0.4), the values of H c and H n decrease, which is due to dipolar interaction rather than intergrain exchange interaction, which is similar to previous reports [15,16,31,32]. The exchange force interaction on the soft moments are weakened and the dipolar interaction amongst the soft grains becomes significant [33].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It can be easily noticed that peaks at the diffractogram are significantly broadened in comparison with those of microcrystalline magnetite, indicating the nanocrystalline nature of the materials studied. The size of crystallites was determined from the line widths of all identified peaks using Scherrer’s formula, D = kλ/βcosθ , where D is the average crystallite size, λ is the wavelength of X-ray used (1.5406 Å), k is a constant (shape factor ~0.9), θ is the angle of diffraction, and β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) [49,50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As milling with t m = 1–10 min, M r / M s > 0.5 reflects the exchange coupling between neighboring grains/NPs. 52 Beyond these t m values, the magnetostatic interaction between grains plays a dominant role because M r / M s < 0.5. Surprisingly, the as-prepared sample ( t m = 0) also belongs to the magnetostatic interaction ( M r / M s < 0.5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%