2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.174409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange coupling and magnetic anisotropy at Fe/FePt interfaces

Abstract: We perform fully relativistic first principles calculations of the exchange interactions and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy (MAE) in an Fe/FePt/Fe sandwich system in order to elucidate how the presence of Fe/FePt (soft/hard magnetic) interfaces impacts on the magnetic properties of Fe/FePt/Fe multilayers. Throughout our study we make comparisons between a geometrically unrelaxed system and a geometrically relaxed system. We observe that the Fe layer at the Fe/FePt interface plays a crucial role inasm… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The atomic resolution allows systems where the typical micromagnetic models break down (e.g., where atomically staggered magnetic order is present) to be investigated. While currently some parameters, such as the exchange interaction and the anisotropy, are inferred from experiments, those can also be taken from ab initio calculations of the actual MTJ stack with atomic resolution [20,23]. Computational feasibility may ultimately limit the size of treatable systems and the accessible time scales; however, this prototypical MTJ study is still far from these limits, suggesting a range of realistic magnetic multilayered devices (including some accounts for disorder) to be well within the scope of the method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atomic resolution allows systems where the typical micromagnetic models break down (e.g., where atomically staggered magnetic order is present) to be investigated. While currently some parameters, such as the exchange interaction and the anisotropy, are inferred from experiments, those can also be taken from ab initio calculations of the actual MTJ stack with atomic resolution [20,23]. Computational feasibility may ultimately limit the size of treatable systems and the accessible time scales; however, this prototypical MTJ study is still far from these limits, suggesting a range of realistic magnetic multilayered devices (including some accounts for disorder) to be well within the scope of the method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sin , 0, cos 2,4 ), our generalized Heisenberg model gives: J zz and J xz can be obtained by mapping this function to the set of (q n , q ( ) E n n ) pairs obtained by means of CDFT calculations. Figure 4 plots the results.…”
Section: Infinite Linear Fe Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A deep understanding of the magnetic properties is crucial, and requires a combination of experiments, theory, and modeling. In most magnetic materials, the arrangement of the atomic magnetizations adopt a collinear(CL) configuration in which a common direction is shared by all of them(usually taken as the z axis) [1,2]. Specifically, each individual magnetization can be parallel or antiparallel to each other, leading to ferromagnetic(FM) or antiferromagnetic(AFM) phases, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently a plenty of theoretical studies have been done [17], [18], [19] and a number of experiments has been performed on FePt-based systems such as exchangecoupled L1 0 FePt/[Co/Ni] N [20], FePt/[Co/Pt] [21], FePt/Fe 3 Pt [6] nanocomposite multilayers, FePt/CoCrNi [22], FePt/FeRh [23], FePt/CoFeTaB [24] bilayers, FePt thin films on Si [25] and CrV [26] substrate, FePt nanoparticles [27], [28], FePt/Fe thin films [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. Among them, FePt/Fe system has shown unique magnetic values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%