2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.75.214402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange bias through a Cu interlayer in anIrMnCosystem

Abstract: Ferromagnetic resonance ͑FMR͒ and magnetization ͑MAG͒ measurements were used to study the exchange interaction between the antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic layers in an IrMn/ Cu/ Co system as a function of the Cu spacer thickness. Although the experimental angular variations of the exchange-bias fields H eb FMR and H eb MAG coincide, the coupling strengths J and the Co layers' anisotropy fields H U , obtained via numerical simulations, are different. For all Cu thicknesses J FMR Ͼ J MAG and H U FMR Ͻ H U MA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum value of Dm dc r decreases and its position shifts towards low-field values when t Cu is increased confirming that the effective FM/AF exchange coupling decreases as the thickness of the spacer is increased. 23,24 The same holds for the asymmetries in the hysteresis loop's shape and in the magnetization reversal, i.e., Dm dc r versus t Cu indicates that the FM is practically uncoupled for t Cu ! 1:0 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The maximum value of Dm dc r decreases and its position shifts towards low-field values when t Cu is increased confirming that the effective FM/AF exchange coupling decreases as the thickness of the spacer is increased. 23,24 The same holds for the asymmetries in the hysteresis loop's shape and in the magnetization reversal, i.e., Dm dc r versus t Cu indicates that the FM is practically uncoupled for t Cu ! 1:0 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…18,31,34,43 Our samples, however, show H Regardless of the type, parallel or antiparallel, of the M/m rot coupling and its strength (J 0 ), H C of an FM/AF bilayer should be enhanced if compared to that of the respective control FM film due to the additional energy necessary to reverse an anisotropic UCS. The same holds for the RA, always positive for J 0 > 0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1); more details can be found elsewhere. 18,30,31 Differently from the previously employed domain-wall formation model, 32 we use uniaxial UCSs as FM's pinning sites instead of interfacial AF domain wall. Note that m set kŝ for very high k set and the model is reduced 33 to the rigid AF moment (RAF) model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference could be attributed to the interplay between two opposing effects: ͑i͒ the role of the Cu spacer for the increase in K eff by reorienting the Co moment toward the perpendicular to the film's plane direction; ͑ii͒ the exponential decrease in J E ͑and, consequently, of H EB ͒ with the thickness of the nonmagnetic ͑NM͒ interlayer in FM/NM/AF films ͑see, e.g., Ref. 23 and references therein͒.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%