2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.01.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange bias of ultrathin CoO/Co bilayers on Ge(111) and Ge(100) surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19,20 The enhanced H E could be attributed to the increasing anisotropy energy of AFM layer K AFM and the increasing number of pinned uncompensated spins at the interface. 4,16 By further increasing the CoO thickness (x=40 ML), the H E at 170 K is reduced. For continuous AFM/FM layers, the increase of the AFM domain size is often observed and the related H E is commonly reduced due to the reduction of both the amount of AFM domain walls and the associated net uncompensated AFM magnetic moments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 The enhanced H E could be attributed to the increasing anisotropy energy of AFM layer K AFM and the increasing number of pinned uncompensated spins at the interface. 4,16 By further increasing the CoO thickness (x=40 ML), the H E at 170 K is reduced. For continuous AFM/FM layers, the increase of the AFM domain size is often observed and the related H E is commonly reduced due to the reduction of both the amount of AFM domain walls and the associated net uncompensated AFM magnetic moments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%