Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle 2007
DOI: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Young Novice Driver Headway Choice in a Simulated Car Following Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together these results suggest a poorer level of vehicle control compared to the more experienced driver group, although while performing the car-following and sign recognition tasks the inexperienced drivers had faster RT and smaller variability in headway. As found in previous research, inexperienced drivers maintained smaller headways (Mitsopoulos-Rubens et al, 2007;Taieb-Maimon and Shinar, 2001). However, the headways maintained in the present study were larger than reported in other studies using our simulator (Mitsopoulos-Rubens et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together these results suggest a poorer level of vehicle control compared to the more experienced driver group, although while performing the car-following and sign recognition tasks the inexperienced drivers had faster RT and smaller variability in headway. As found in previous research, inexperienced drivers maintained smaller headways (Mitsopoulos-Rubens et al, 2007;Taieb-Maimon and Shinar, 2001). However, the headways maintained in the present study were larger than reported in other studies using our simulator (Mitsopoulos-Rubens et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As found in previous research, inexperienced drivers maintained smaller headways (Mitsopoulos-Rubens et al, 2007;Taieb-Maimon and Shinar, 2001). However, the headways maintained in the present study were larger than reported in other studies using our simulator (Mitsopoulos-Rubens et al, 2007). The mean and standard deviation of headway maintained by the experienced drivers increased further in the high cannabis condition, perhaps suggesting that experienced drivers compensate for the extra demand of responding to signs under the influence of cannabis by driving more conservatively, although this remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Most teen driving assessments used in research (e.g., in-vehicle data recorders, event-based video monitoring, self-report surveys, simulators, closed tracks) are geared toward newly licensed teens and are thus ill-suited to characterize skill and judgment deficits or crash risk before licensure (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). These assessments have, however, enhanced our understanding of specific driving deficiencies of newly licensed teens that may contribute to elevated crash risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No driving simulator findings have been reported, however, on the assessment of rear-end collision risk under different traffic conditions or given diverse roadway configurations. A great deal of research with the simulators has been carried out, however, to study car-following performance with respect to the effect on it of such factors as fog (8), alcohol and distraction (9), vehicle advance warning devices (10), and young novice drivers (11). The amount of such research points to the potential that driving simulators have as aids in the study of the car-following maneuver.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%