2016
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the social determinants of children's developmental health: protocol for building a pan-Canadian population-based monitoring system for early childhood development

Abstract: IntroductionEarly childhood is a key period to establish policies and practices that optimise children's health and development, but Canada lacks nationally representative data on social indicators of children's well-being. To address this gap, the Early Development Instrument (EDI), a teacher-administered questionnaire completed for kindergarten-age children, has been implemented across most Canadian provinces over the past 10 years. The purpose of this protocol is to describe the Canadian Neighbourhoods and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The EDI has demonstrated validity and reliability, and is currently in wide use across Canada [Janus & Offord, ; Janus et al, ]. The psychometric properties and validity of the EDI have been confirmed in many studies, based on its differential item functioning, multilevel validity, factor structure, internal consistencies, as well as associations with other developmental outcomes [Guhn et al, ; Janus & Offord, ; Janus et al, ]. By 2016, EDI data had been collected on over 1 million kindergarten students across Canada, and several provincial governments had implemented provincially funded regular EDI data collection for all senior kindergarten (SK) students [Janus & Reid‐Westoby, ; Janus et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The EDI has demonstrated validity and reliability, and is currently in wide use across Canada [Janus & Offord, ; Janus et al, ]. The psychometric properties and validity of the EDI have been confirmed in many studies, based on its differential item functioning, multilevel validity, factor structure, internal consistencies, as well as associations with other developmental outcomes [Guhn et al, ; Janus & Offord, ; Janus et al, ]. By 2016, EDI data had been collected on over 1 million kindergarten students across Canada, and several provincial governments had implemented provincially funded regular EDI data collection for all senior kindergarten (SK) students [Janus & Reid‐Westoby, ; Janus et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In showing this, we pave the way for a more extensive use of the EDI data for research and policy evaluation in this important, yet often neglected, population. 24 While the lack of specific diagnosis data is a limitation of our study, complete diagnostic information is rarely available at such a young age. Due to the small numbers of children with any given diagnosis, education systems cannot respond with interventions tailored to specific conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our study set out to demonstrate that the EDI's psychometric properties for kindergarten children with special health needs are as robust as those for their typically developing counterparts. In showing this, we pave the way for a more extensive use of the EDI data for research and policy evaluation in this important, yet often neglected, population …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research is a part of the Canadian Neighbourhoods and Early Child Development (CanNECD) study [25]. Data were obtained from the Early Development Instrument (EDI) database housed at the Offord Centre for Child Studies, Mc-Master University [26].…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%