2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-021-09623-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Psychometric Properties of a New Integrative Learning Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary variables for this study consist of a four-item index of students’ intention to innovate (Mayhew et al, 2012 , 2016 ; Selznick & Mayhew, 2018 ) 2 and a nine-item index of integrative learning (see Youngerman et al, 2021 ). The exogenous variable intention to innovate provides one item associated with each of the reduced dimensions of Shane’s ( 2003 ) model, which moves from opportunity recognition (e.g., “Identifying new opportunities (such as a new product or service, a more effective way of accomplishing tasks, or a new way to solve a common problem)”) to creation (e.g., “Creating a new entity to take advantage of new opportunities (for example, a team organization, a business/non-profit, or a club devoted to the new opportunity)”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The primary variables for this study consist of a four-item index of students’ intention to innovate (Mayhew et al, 2012 , 2016 ; Selznick & Mayhew, 2018 ) 2 and a nine-item index of integrative learning (see Youngerman et al, 2021 ). The exogenous variable intention to innovate provides one item associated with each of the reduced dimensions of Shane’s ( 2003 ) model, which moves from opportunity recognition (e.g., “Identifying new opportunities (such as a new product or service, a more effective way of accomplishing tasks, or a new way to solve a common problem)”) to creation (e.g., “Creating a new entity to take advantage of new opportunities (for example, a team organization, a business/non-profit, or a club devoted to the new opportunity)”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AAC&U’s ( 2010 ) VALUE rubric for integrative learning has proven influential (Rhodes & Finley, 2013 ) and has fueled an understanding that integrative learning involves, in particular, students “adapt[ing] and apply[ing] skills, abilities, theories, or methodologies gained in one situation to new situations” (p.2). Drawing on previous efforts, Youngerman et al ( 2021 ) developed a measure of integrative learning with robust psychometric properties, including validity and reliability; the measure highlights student demonstrations of reflecting, applying, contextualizing, and extrapolating (Youngerman et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Conceptual and Literature Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While both types of measures are important in SoTL research, future research on the AMP could include student work within the evaluation (e.g., reflections, final projects, exams). Using existing measures related to IL (e.g., Integrated Learning Scale; Youngerman, Dahl, & Mayhew, 2021) and student collaboration (e.g., Collaborative Knowledge Practices Questionnaire; Karlgren et al, 2020), or developing new valid measures related to student agency would also be helpful to future evaluative research comparing the impact of teaching interventions across various adolescent development courses (e.g., comparing the AMP and an alternative teaching approach in another adolescent development course).…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%