Handbook of Workplace Diversity 2006
DOI: 10.4135/9781848608092.n1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Contours of Workplace Diversity: Concepts, Contexts and Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"alignment," and "misalignment" have been used elsewhere in identity management and diversity literatures (e.g., Ferdman & Roberts, 2013;Prasad, Pringle, & Konrad, 2006;Roberts, 2013), we view our theorizing as distinguishable from and complementary to that theorizing. Namely, our central focus is on the quality of a manager-subordinate relationship as the primary outcome (cf., Kreiner, Hollensbe, & Sheep, 2006;Ramarajan & Reid, 2013).…”
Section: The Effect Of Managing a Subordinate's Multiple Identities Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"alignment," and "misalignment" have been used elsewhere in identity management and diversity literatures (e.g., Ferdman & Roberts, 2013;Prasad, Pringle, & Konrad, 2006;Roberts, 2013), we view our theorizing as distinguishable from and complementary to that theorizing. Namely, our central focus is on the quality of a manager-subordinate relationship as the primary outcome (cf., Kreiner, Hollensbe, & Sheep, 2006;Ramarajan & Reid, 2013).…”
Section: The Effect Of Managing a Subordinate's Multiple Identities Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings suggest that the salience of particular social relations and of definitions of diversity is contextual. Some organizations may, therefore, be more favorable toward white women managers while others are more welcoming to male ethnic minorities (Prasad et al 2006). Consequently, the salience of constructions of various social relations within an organization may vary.…”
Section: Managerial Practices Of Diversity and Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of social diversity, that is, their homogeneity, due to the underrepresentation of social groups such as women and ethnic and sexual minorities (see, for example, Zandvliet 2002, Wirth 2004, OSA 2005, Lopez-Claros and Sahidi 2010, Netherlands 2010. We assume, therefore, that social diversity is not a neutral or natural fact but a discourse that is informed by a constellation of social relations of power such as gender, ethnicity, and sexuality that constitute organizational members (Zanoni and Janssens 2003, Janssens and Zanoni 2005, Prasad et al 2006. In this paper, we explore the relationship between managerial understandings of diversity and of these three social relations of power.…”
Section: Managerial Practices Of Diversity and Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Thomas and Ely, 1996). In order to reap the benefit of diverse perspectives, some scholars suggest that organizations provide plenty of opportunities for employees to reflect, respect, value, and communicate different perspectives with each other during business activities (Ferdman and Davidson, 2002;Mor Barak and Cherin, 1998;Prasad, Pringle, and Konrad, 2006). Ely and Thomas' (2001) approach to diversity learning is important as it promotes organization-wide learning between minority group members (who often hold lower hierarchical status) and majority group members (who often hold higher hierarchical status) to exchange their perspectives for a common purpose at the organizational level.…”
Section: Organizational Diversity Learning Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%