Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2011.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining success factors in the adoption of digital object identifier systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are consistent with some studies [15], [4], [8], [16] and [17]. However, this result is also inconsistent with some studies [18]- [19].…”
Section: Advances In Social Science Education and Humanities Researcsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The results of this study are consistent with some studies [15], [4], [8], [16] and [17]. However, this result is also inconsistent with some studies [18]- [19].…”
Section: Advances In Social Science Education and Humanities Researcsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…According to this definition, then, perceived usefulness can be considered a valid replacement measure for IS impact on the individual level [37]. Several researchers have followed this view in including perceived usefulness as a surrogate for the individual impact of IS [e.g., 30,32,37]. Therefore, we considered items and measures from the construct of "usefulness" when its purpose to measure the benefits from past use was clearly stated.…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-five of the articles measured "usefulness" [e.g., 42], "perceived usefulness" [e.g., 8,32], or "social usefulness" [e.g., 29] in the context of IS success. Originating from TAM [10], "perceived usefulness" refers to "the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would enhance his or her job performance" [10, p. 320].…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test and validate the research model, the authors incorporate both Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on the total of 811 valid responses. As per Park, Zo [56] and Liu, Kauffman [57], Bartlett's test of sphericity has been performed to determine the degree of correlation and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test to find sampling adequacy on the first half of the collected sample, N EFA =405. As per Andy [58], Hair, Anderson [51], and Mitrevski and Hristoski [52], the researchers also carried out a Tolerance and Variance Inflation (VIF) test to examine multicollinearity.…”
Section: Factor Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%