Examining geological controls on baseflow index (BFI) using regression analysis: An illustration from the Thames Basin, UK

Abstract

Linear regression methods can be used to quantify geological controls on baseflow index (BFI). This is illustrated using an example from the Thames Basin, UK. Two approaches have been adopted. The areal extents of geological classes based on lithostratigraphic and hydrogeological classification schemes have been correlated with BFI for 44 'natural' catchments from the Thames Basin. When regression models are built using lithostratigraphic classes that include a constant term then the model is shown to have some physical meaning and the relative influence of the different geological classes on BFI can be quantified. For example, the regression constants for two such models, 0.64 and 0.69, are consistent with the mean observed BFI (0.65) for the Thames Basin, and the signs and relative magnitudes of the regression coefficients for each of the lithostratigraphic classes are consistent with the hydrogeology of the basin. In addition, regression coefficients for the lithostratigraphic classes scale linearly with estimates of log 10 hydraulic conductivity for each lithological class. When a regression is built using a hydrogeological classification scheme with no constant term, the model does not have any physical meaning, but it has a relatively high adjusted R 2 value and because of the continuous coverage of the hydrogeological classification scheme, the model can be used for predictive purposes. A model calibrated on the 44 'natural' catchments and using four hydrogeological classes (low permeability surficial deposits, consolidated aquitards, fractured aquifers and intergranular aquifers) is shown to perform as well as a model based on a hydrology of soil types (BFIHOST) scheme in predicting BFI in the Thames Basin. Validation of this model using 110 other 'variably impacted' catchments in the Basin shows that there is a correlation between modelled and observed BFI. Where the observed BFI is significantly higher than modelled BFI the deviations can be explained by an exogenous factor, catchment urban area. It is inferred that this is may be due influences from sewage discharge, mains leakage, and leakage from septic tanks.

Benchmarking Ensemble Streamflow Prediction skill in the UK

“…Although it is encouraging that GR4J storage parameter values (X1 and X3) appear to show some physical realism, a note of caution is needed as GR4J is not a physics-based hydrological model, nor is it guaranteed that these results are directly transferable to any lumped catchment hydrological model. It has also been noted that the BFI is influenced by many other factors such as lake and snow storage (Parry et al, 2016), therefore a more 25 detailed examination of the physical hydrogeological controls on catchment BFI, such as in Bloomfield et al (2009) for the Thames, is needed at a national scale.…”

A review of the impact of climate change on future nitrate concentrations in groundwater of the UK

“…The Base Flow Index (BFI) is used as a measure of the baseflow characteristics of river catchments and has been shown to be a function of the hydraulic characteristic of the geological units within the catchment (Bloomfield et al, 2009). BFI provides a systematic way of assessing the average proportion of base flow in the total run-off of a catchment.…”

Regression Modeling of Baseflow and Baseflow Index for Michigan USA

“…In order words, they are not applicable to ungauged areas where records of streamflow do not exist. Previous studies have used regression analysis extensively to estimate baseflow at ungauged sites in various regions of the world [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. For example, Santhi et al [23] utilized regression analysis to relate relief, percentage of sand and effective rainfall to baseflow index (BFI) and baseflow volume for the conterminous United States.…”