2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining affective structure in chickens: valence, intensity, persistence and generalization measured using a Conditioned Place Preference Test

Abstract: HighlightsConditioned Place Preference tests were used to study affective responses in hens.Both air puff and water spray stimuli produced conditioned place aversions.A robotic snake, and the sound of conspecific alarm calls, did not.Negative affective responses can differ in their persistence and generalization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the birds may not have been able to localise the source of the negative stimulus, unlike the direct air puffs and water. Finally, birds might have failed to generalise the negative stimuli received during training [39]. We designed our procedure with the belief that the intended results would provide a clear indication of the animals' impression and preference, relative to a resource that was unambiguously attractive [31]-i.e., feed-as indicated by continuous feeding seen in birds exposed to medical air.…”
Section: Signs Of Aversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the birds may not have been able to localise the source of the negative stimulus, unlike the direct air puffs and water. Finally, birds might have failed to generalise the negative stimuli received during training [39]. We designed our procedure with the belief that the intended results would provide a clear indication of the animals' impression and preference, relative to a resource that was unambiguously attractive [31]-i.e., feed-as indicated by continuous feeding seen in birds exposed to medical air.…”
Section: Signs Of Aversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a food reward, or a painful stimulus) [ 15 ]. The CPP test has also been used for assessing conditioning effects of other stimuli relevant from an animal welfare perspective, such as access to a running wheel in rats [ 16 ] and aversive stimuli in chickens [ 17 ]. Chickens also develop a CPP in response to food [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific term of EI is not frequently used in the animal-based literature but studies do indicate the presence of EI when compared with the descriptions in the originally proposed EI framework (19). For example, conditioned place preference/avoidance tests suggest livestock animals are able to avoid/seek previous negative or positive emotional experiences (22)(23)(24) indicating self-regulation of emotional states. Pigs show evidence of emotional contagion where naïve animals will recognize and respond according to the positive or negative emotional state of conspecifics (25,26).…”
Section: Defining Cognition and Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%