1986
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1986.62.3.975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of the Sex Difference on a Symbol Digit Substitution Test

Abstract: Factors that may contribute to the sex difference on a symbol-digit substitution test were investigated. Aspects of motor ability were determined to be involved in the sex-related difference in performance. Scanning ability and oral speed were related to performance of the task; however, these factors were not involved in the sex-related difference.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of age are consistent with the general trends in the literature. The significantly faster times reported for women across age categories are consistent with previous studies (Bryden & Roy, 2005;Polubinski & Melamed, 1986), with the gender differences more visible in DH than NDH performance (cf. Schmidt et al, 2000).…”
Section: Socio-demographic Variablessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effects of age are consistent with the general trends in the literature. The significantly faster times reported for women across age categories are consistent with previous studies (Bryden & Roy, 2005;Polubinski & Melamed, 1986), with the gender differences more visible in DH than NDH performance (cf. Schmidt et al, 2000).…”
Section: Socio-demographic Variablessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The effect of gender is less consistent. Some studies found that women perform noticeably faster than men (Bryden & Roy, 2005; Polubinski & Melamed, 1986; Van Wijk, 2012), and greater inter-manual differences for females compared to males were reported (Thompson, Heaton, Matthews, & Grant, 1987). One study found significant gender differences for the dominant hand (DH) only (Schmidt, Oliveira, Rocha, & Abreu-Villaca, 2000), while another did not find any significant gender difference (Strenge, Niederberger, & Seelhorst, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another significant individual difference variable associated with symbol substitution type tasks is that women reliably outperform men on such tasks (e.g., Lezak, 1995, p. 380). Polubinski and Melamed (1986) demonstrated a main effect of sex on performance on the SDMT that was highly reliable (p < 0.001) and the interaction of sex and handedness was also significant (p < 0.01). Schear and Sato (1989) found that Finger Tapping and the Grooved Pegboard predicted unique variance in the Digit Symbol subtest, suggesting that motor speed and dexterity are significant components of Planned Codes.…”
Section: Planned Codesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“… 12 The differences in the hemispheric lateralization of function may explain the differences between men and women. 13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%