1957
DOI: 10.1084/jem.105.2.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of the L Forms of Group a Streptococci for the Group-Specific Polysaccharide and M Protein

Abstract: Two strains of L forms of group A streptococci were examined for group-specific polysaccharide and found to lack this substance. One of these was found to make a substance that had several properties in common with M protein. It is suggested that the absence of the cell wall polysaccharide is responsible for the lack of rigidity of the L form and that the L form of this species closely resembles protoplasts as prepared from other species.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group A streptococcus L forms do not possess the group specific polysaccharide (8); they are capable of producing the M protein, but the M protein is not fixed in the cell but diffuses into the medium (8). The works of Cram ford (1) and Lynn and Muellenhery (6) suggest that group A streptococcus L forms contain an extra antigenic component not shared by the parent bacterial strain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group A streptococcus L forms do not possess the group specific polysaccharide (8); they are capable of producing the M protein, but the M protein is not fixed in the cell but diffuses into the medium (8). The works of Cram ford (1) and Lynn and Muellenhery (6) suggest that group A streptococcus L forms contain an extra antigenic component not shared by the parent bacterial strain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further evidence for a deficiency in cell-wall components from L-forms has been provided by serological techniques; for example, the L-forms of group A streptococci were found to lack group-specific polysaccharide (Sharp, Hijmans & Dienes, 1957). Similar results had earlier been obtained in the cases of L-forms of Streptobacillus moniliformis (Klieneberger, 1942) and Proteus (Dienes, Weinberger & Madoff, 1950), although these studies antedated much important work on cell-wall structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Since the precise structural relationship between the cell-wall teichoic acid and the muramic-acid-containing mucopeptide is unknown, it is impossible to judge whether the non-production of ribitol teichoic acid might be caused by the absence of rigid mucopeptide or is a more direct consequence of antibiotic action. In L-forms of group A streptococci, the M protein, which is normally found in the cell wall, is still produced but is liberated into the culture medium (Sharp, Hijmans & Dienes, 1957). The possibility was considered that the teichoic acid of the staphylococci might behave in the same way but no evidence for this was found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view has received confirmation by chemical and serological studies of group A /&haemolytic streptococci (Sharp, Hijmans & Dienes, 1957) and other species as reviewed by Roberts, McQuillen & Roberts (1959). The accumulation of a N-acetylamino sugar precursor of cell walls of Staphylococcus uureus incubated with penicillin was reported by Park & Strominger (1957), and explained as a consequence of deficient cell-wall formation following the action of the antibiotic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%