2010
DOI: 10.3758/app.72.3.706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of gaze behaviors under in situ and video simulation task constraints reveals differences in information pickup for perception and action

Abstract: Gaze and movement behaviors of association football goalkeepers were compared under two video simulation conditions (i.e., verbal and joystick movement responses) and three in situ conditions (i.e., verbal, simplified body movement, and interceptive response). The results showed that the goalkeepers spent more time fixating on information from the penalty kick taker's movements than ball location for all perceptual judgment conditions involving limited movement (i.e., verbal responses, joystick movement, and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
259
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(128 reference statements)
12
259
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As predicted, the expert participants were significantly more accurate at anticipation on the temporal occlusion test compared to the novice participants. Findings support previous research showing that expert athletes are better than novice athletes at anticipating upcoming actions (Abernethy, Gill, Parks, & Packer, 2001;Dicks, Button, & Davids, 2010;Gabbett, Rubinoff, Thorburn, & Farrow, 2007;Muller, Abernethy, & Farrow, 2006;Savelsbergh et al, 2002;Williams et al, 2002), especially earlier in the execution of the action (Abernethy, 1990;Williams et al, 2002). The expert group have a significantly greater amount of domain specific experience, thus enabling them to combine the current environmental situation with those previous experiences to aid in response selection (Causer et al, 2012), whereas the novices do not.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As predicted, the expert participants were significantly more accurate at anticipation on the temporal occlusion test compared to the novice participants. Findings support previous research showing that expert athletes are better than novice athletes at anticipating upcoming actions (Abernethy, Gill, Parks, & Packer, 2001;Dicks, Button, & Davids, 2010;Gabbett, Rubinoff, Thorburn, & Farrow, 2007;Muller, Abernethy, & Farrow, 2006;Savelsbergh et al, 2002;Williams et al, 2002), especially earlier in the execution of the action (Abernethy, 1990;Williams et al, 2002). The expert group have a significantly greater amount of domain specific experience, thus enabling them to combine the current environmental situation with those previous experiences to aid in response selection (Causer et al, 2012), whereas the novices do not.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Uncertainty is one of the key antecedents associated with anxiety (Lox 1992), so any strategy that increases perceived control should be beneficial in competitive, pressurized settings. As goalkeepers do not appear to utilize information from the kicker's eyes, it is also unlikely that advanced anticipatory cues are being provided (Dicks et al 2010;Savelsbergh et al 2005). We suggest that performers should therefore treat the penalty as a faraiming task, and practice hitting the optimal scoring regions (the top corners) with sufficient power to beat a goalkeeper (Bar-Eli and Azar 2009).…”
Section: Pressure Effects: Shootoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A long duration fixation on a specific location contributes to better body positioning, a more balanced stance and the timing of limb actions that are efficient and economical. Evidence supporting the efficacy of testing individuals in realistic spatial environments where GPS-like gaze coordinates can be accessed comes from a paper by Button et al (this volume) and Dicks et al (2010) who tested elite soccer goaltenders in five experimental conditions: two using video simulations of penalty kicks with verbal and joystick responses, and three carried out on the field with verbal, step, and real world responses. Not only did the goalkeepers make more saves in the real world condition, but their fixation locations changed significantly across the five conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%