2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of a high-efficiency solid oxide fuel cell system that reuses exhaust gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum electrical efficiency theory developed above is applied to fuel cell systems fueled by methane, propane, and hydrogen, assuming both the total pressures of fuel and air are both 1 atm. In most literatures the low heating value (LHV) of a fuel for the fuel cell efficiency was used [3,6,7,13], the numerical results presented here are also based on h fuel (T 0 )=LHV. Conversion to high heating value (HHV) efficiency only requires a scaling factor of LHV/HHV.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum electrical efficiency theory developed above is applied to fuel cell systems fueled by methane, propane, and hydrogen, assuming both the total pressures of fuel and air are both 1 atm. In most literatures the low heating value (LHV) of a fuel for the fuel cell efficiency was used [3,6,7,13], the numerical results presented here are also based on h fuel (T 0 )=LHV. Conversion to high heating value (HHV) efficiency only requires a scaling factor of LHV/HHV.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous efforts have been made towards the understanding of the fuel cell electrical efficiency [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Lutz et al performed a thermodynamic analysis and concluded that the maximum fuel cell efficiency is equivalent to the Carnot cycle with the high temper-ature reservoir set at the fuel combustion temperature [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques for removing CO 2 include using a CO 2 absorbent [17,18] or a CO 2 separation membrane [19]. Experimental studies showed that a gross power generation efficiency of DC 77.8% (LHV) was obtained by removing CO 2 as well as H 2 O in the fuel regeneration process using the twostage stacks, although the module had not achieved thermal self-sustainability [15][16]. Raising the stack temperatures also contributes to higher power generation efficiency because the cell voltage increases with the cell temperature during SOFC power generation [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this technology, the module could be operated at an extremely high total fuel utilization rate without operating individual SOFC stacks at excessively high fuel utilization rates. The authors are not aware of reports on SOFC modules using twostage SOFC stacks and a fuel regeneration process between them, except for the authors' previous studies that experimentally demonstrate the advantages of the technology [15,16]. In the previous study, heaters were used to maintain the stack temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic approach of improving the efficiency of simple once-through SOFC systems is the increase of the global fuel utilization FU while maintaining a suitable local fuel utilization FU at stack level. Two different pathways have been discussed in literature: (i) single-stage SOFC module with anode off-gas recirculation [25][26][27], and (ii) two-stage SOFC module with a fuel regenerator between the modules [13][14][15]28].…”
Section: Sofc Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%