2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex Vivo Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Foramen Locators in Root Canals with an Obstructed Apical Foramen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
42
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
42
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Others considered AE1 mm as ''acceptable'' because of the enormous anatomic variability of the apical region, even though this range might overestimate the precision of the EALs (12,20); >AE1 mm was considered ''mistaken'' measurements because it may result in over-or underinstrumentation of the root canal system (3,7,20,24). In the study herein, the percentage of ''mistaken'' measurements obtained was higher than those previously reported (11,14,15,(19)(20)(21). This may stem from the difference in the methods used to determine the position of the AC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Others considered AE1 mm as ''acceptable'' because of the enormous anatomic variability of the apical region, even though this range might overestimate the precision of the EALs (12,20); >AE1 mm was considered ''mistaken'' measurements because it may result in over-or underinstrumentation of the root canal system (3,7,20,24). In the study herein, the percentage of ''mistaken'' measurements obtained was higher than those previously reported (11,14,15,(19)(20)(21). This may stem from the difference in the methods used to determine the position of the AC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…EAL readings were divided into ''precise,'' ''acceptable,'' and ''mistaken'' measurements based on their level of accuracy. Previous studies considered EAL readings accurate if they have an error range of AE0.5 mm (12,13,15). Others considered AE1 mm as ''acceptable'' because of the enormous anatomic variability of the apical region, even though this range might overestimate the precision of the EALs (12,20); >AE1 mm was considered ''mistaken'' measurements because it may result in over-or underinstrumentation of the root canal system (3,7,20,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electronic apex locator and periapical radiography are convenient tools to determine root canal working length in routine clinical practice [11,12]. The electronic apex locators are useful adjuncts in determining working length during endodontic therapy, with a reported accuracy of up to 93% [13], which is higher than radiography [14]. The widespread use of implanted cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has increased the concern regarding the use of electronic apex locators in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%