1994
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-94-07503-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving plane curves by curvature in relative geometries II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic reason is that such ideas crucially relied on the fact that, in the convex case, the normal velocity is always directed inward (which is clearly false for non-convex droplets, at points where the curvature is negative). Secondly, proving existence and regularity of solution requires very different analytic and geometric arguments in the non-convex case with respect to the convex one (there, we were able to use ideas from [15,13,14]). At any rate, our previous result [20] is important in Section 6, where the evolution of the droplet boundary is controlled by locally comparing it with that of a suitable convex droplet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic reason is that such ideas crucially relied on the fact that, in the convex case, the normal velocity is always directed inward (which is clearly false for non-convex droplets, at points where the curvature is negative). Secondly, proving existence and regularity of solution requires very different analytic and geometric arguments in the non-convex case with respect to the convex one (there, we were able to use ideas from [15,13,14]). At any rate, our previous result [20] is important in Section 6, where the evolution of the droplet boundary is controlled by locally comparing it with that of a suitable convex droplet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other crucial point in the proof is obtaining precise regularity estimates on the deterministic curve shortening flow. This builds on geometric and analytic ideas of Grayson [16], GageHamilton [15], Gage-Li [13,14], Chou-Zhu [6] and others. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been extensively studied in the last two decades. See [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]15,16,18,19,[21][22][23][24][25]32]. Assuming that γ (·, t) is convex, then we can use the normal angle θ to parameterize γ , and Eq.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the solution to the even L p -Minkowski problem was one of the critical ingredients needed to obtain sharp affine Sobolev inequalities [13], [12] and, for p = 2, it has implications to the Cramer-Rao inequality, one of the basic inequalities in information theory [14]. Recent progress has been made in a variety of cases depending on p and n with a plethora of methods mostly from PDE, [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [11], [15], [18], [19], [20] to cite just a few. Yet, much of the problem still presents a real challenge when p < 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniqueness was established only for the even problem, [6]. In fact, even more interesting is the fact that for any p ≥ 1, and any n ≥ 1, the discrete L pMinkowski problem has a unique solution independent of the structure of the sets U ⊂ S n and , [9], where γ i corresponds now to the surface area of the i-th facet of outer normal → u i .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%