2018
DOI: 10.11610/isij.4012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving Models of Using Armed Forces in Domestic Disaster Response and Relief

Abstract: Due to the high level of readiness and their comprehensive capabilities, armed forces are demanded or expected to contribute to the response to incident and disasters of natural, technogenic or manmade origin. Military units may provide surge capacity, unique capabilities, long-term support to relief and recovery or even be the first to respond to a disaster. This article reviews the European experience in the organisation for using armed forces in domestic disaster response and relief operations, models of mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article contributes to filling that gap by leveraging the COVID-19 pandemic’s global reach to systematically evaluate common hypotheses about when and how militaries are used to respond to domestic disasters in a setting that is globally comparable. A significant theoretical and case-based scholarship addressing the use of militaries in disaster relief (e.g., Croissant et al, 2010 ; Egnell, 2008 ; Gibson-Fall, 2021 ; Head & Mann, 2009 ; Kalkman, 2021 ; Kapucu, 2011 ; Kohn, 2003 ; Laksmana, 2010 ; Levinson, 2008 ; Schrader, 1993 ; Tkacz, 2006 ; Malešič, 2015 ; Pion-Berlin, 2016 ; Pramanik, 2018 ; Ratchev & Tagarev, 2018 ; Tagarev & Ratchev, 2018 ) and research on the securitization of healthcare and disaster response more generally (e.g., Bernard, 2013 ; Curley & Herington, 2011 ; Chigudu, 2016 ; Davies, 2008 ; Enemark, 2009 ; Kamradt-Scott & McInnes, 2012 ; Kelle, 2007 ; McInnes & Lee, 2006 ; McInnes & Rushton, 2013 ; Roemer-Mahler & Elbe, 2016 ; Oshewolo & Nwozor, 2020 ; Watterson & Kamradt-Scott, 2016 ) has generated important hypotheses about what drives domestic deployments in disaster response. 1 These hypotheses tend to highlight the role of disaster-related, state (including military) capacity, and social and political factors in driving the use of militaries in disaster response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article contributes to filling that gap by leveraging the COVID-19 pandemic’s global reach to systematically evaluate common hypotheses about when and how militaries are used to respond to domestic disasters in a setting that is globally comparable. A significant theoretical and case-based scholarship addressing the use of militaries in disaster relief (e.g., Croissant et al, 2010 ; Egnell, 2008 ; Gibson-Fall, 2021 ; Head & Mann, 2009 ; Kalkman, 2021 ; Kapucu, 2011 ; Kohn, 2003 ; Laksmana, 2010 ; Levinson, 2008 ; Schrader, 1993 ; Tkacz, 2006 ; Malešič, 2015 ; Pion-Berlin, 2016 ; Pramanik, 2018 ; Ratchev & Tagarev, 2018 ; Tagarev & Ratchev, 2018 ) and research on the securitization of healthcare and disaster response more generally (e.g., Bernard, 2013 ; Curley & Herington, 2011 ; Chigudu, 2016 ; Davies, 2008 ; Enemark, 2009 ; Kamradt-Scott & McInnes, 2012 ; Kelle, 2007 ; McInnes & Lee, 2006 ; McInnes & Rushton, 2013 ; Roemer-Mahler & Elbe, 2016 ; Oshewolo & Nwozor, 2020 ; Watterson & Kamradt-Scott, 2016 ) has generated important hypotheses about what drives domestic deployments in disaster response. 1 These hypotheses tend to highlight the role of disaster-related, state (including military) capacity, and social and political factors in driving the use of militaries in disaster response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%