“…This article contributes to filling that gap by leveraging the COVID-19 pandemic’s global reach to systematically evaluate common hypotheses about when and how militaries are used to respond to domestic disasters in a setting that is globally comparable. A significant theoretical and case-based scholarship addressing the use of militaries in disaster relief (e.g., Croissant et al, 2010 ; Egnell, 2008 ; Gibson-Fall, 2021 ; Head & Mann, 2009 ; Kalkman, 2021 ; Kapucu, 2011 ; Kohn, 2003 ; Laksmana, 2010 ; Levinson, 2008 ; Schrader, 1993 ; Tkacz, 2006 ; Malešič, 2015 ; Pion-Berlin, 2016 ; Pramanik, 2018 ; Ratchev & Tagarev, 2018 ; Tagarev & Ratchev, 2018 ) and research on the securitization of healthcare and disaster response more generally (e.g., Bernard, 2013 ; Curley & Herington, 2011 ; Chigudu, 2016 ; Davies, 2008 ; Enemark, 2009 ; Kamradt-Scott & McInnes, 2012 ; Kelle, 2007 ; McInnes & Lee, 2006 ; McInnes & Rushton, 2013 ; Roemer-Mahler & Elbe, 2016 ; Oshewolo & Nwozor, 2020 ; Watterson & Kamradt-Scott, 2016 ) has generated important hypotheses about what drives domestic deployments in disaster response. 1 These hypotheses tend to highlight the role of disaster-related, state (including military) capacity, and social and political factors in driving the use of militaries in disaster response.…”