2020
DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving insights: how DNA repair pathways impact cancer evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 257 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma ctDNA remains an excellent surrogate for the extracranial solid tumors in our analysis given that it shares a highly consistent GI score with the primary tumor tissue ( Figure S2 , r = 0.9, p < 0.01). As a result, the significantly higher GI scores and the higher proportion of samples with a high GI status in CSF actually reflect a difference between extracranial metastasis and MM, which could be explained by clonal evolution [ 30 ], that is, GI first occurred in the metastatic subclone of the primary tumor and then metastasized into the MM lesion to become the master clone before being detected. Another possibility is that GI occurs after MM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma ctDNA remains an excellent surrogate for the extracranial solid tumors in our analysis given that it shares a highly consistent GI score with the primary tumor tissue ( Figure S2 , r = 0.9, p < 0.01). As a result, the significantly higher GI scores and the higher proportion of samples with a high GI status in CSF actually reflect a difference between extracranial metastasis and MM, which could be explained by clonal evolution [ 30 ], that is, GI first occurred in the metastatic subclone of the primary tumor and then metastasized into the MM lesion to become the master clone before being detected. Another possibility is that GI occurs after MM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic instability is one of the main features of tumor progression and heterogeneity ( Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011 ; Macheret and Halazonetis, 2015 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ). Research on its effect has been carried out very early during the process, and some investigators have performed preliminary experimental research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic instability is one of the fundamental features of cancer and contributes to the intratumoral heterogeneity. The events from genomic instability are classified into the two classes, i.e., small range aberrations such as mutation of driver genes and tumor suppressor genes, and large range aberrations due to chromosomal instability leading to the production of aneuploid cells [ 70 ]. The latter has been designated as macroevolution of cancer [ 71 ], in which various chromosomal changes result in loss of tumor suppressor genes, chimeric fusion of oncogenes, and oncogene amplifications [ 72 73 ].…”
Section: Chromosomal Instatbility and Macroevolution Of Hgscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROS often causes the DNA damage with double-strand break, and dysfunction of DNA repair pathway due to HRD may accelerate the chromosomal instability ( Fig. 5 ) [ 70 ]. In addition, it has recently been hypothesized that epigenetic reprogramming precedes to various genetic or chromosomal alterations as the earliest step of carcinogenesis [ 83 84 85 ].…”
Section: Chromosomal Instatbility and Macroevolution Of Hgscmentioning
confidence: 99%