Evolutionary trade-offs and the structure of polymorphisms

Abstract

Populations of organisms show genetic differences called polymorphisms. Understanding the effects of polymorphisms is important for biology and medicine. Here, we ask which polymorphisms occur at high frequency when organisms evolve under trade-offs between multiple tasks. Multiple tasks present a problem, because it is not possible to be optimal at all tasks simultaneously and hence compromises are necessary. Recent work indicates that trade-offs lead to a simple geometry of phenotypes in the space of traits: phenotypes fall on the Pareto front, which is shaped as a polytope: a line, triangle, tetrahedron etc. The vertices of these polytopes are the optimal phenotypes for a single task. Up to now, work on this Pareto approach has not considered its genetic underpinnings. Here, we address this by asking how the polymorphism structure of a population is affected by evolution under trade-offs. We simulate a multi-task selection scenario, in which the population evolves to the Pareto front: the line segment between two archetypes or the triangle between three archetypes. We find that polymorphisms that become prevalent in the population have pleiotropic phenotypic effects that align with the Pareto front. Similarly, epistatic effects between prevalent polymorphisms are parallel to the front. Alignment with the front occurs also for asexual mating. Alignment is reduced when drift or linkage is strong, and is replaced by a more complex structure in which many perpendicular allele effects cancel out. Aligned polymorphism structure allows mating to produce offspring that stand a good chance of being optimal multi-taskers in at least one of the locales available to the species.This article is part of the theme issue 'Self-organization in cell biology'.

Tumor diversity and the trade-off between universal cancer tasks

“…In connecting intratumor heterogeneity with intertumor diversity, one prediction based on concepts from ecology 45,46 is called “evolution along lines of least genetic resistance”—the finding that the main axes of variations between individuals in a given species is aligned with variation between species in the same taxon. In the case of cancer, single cells and tumors may play the role of individuals and species so that variation between single cells in a tumor will align with variation between different tumors because of the shared tasks 23 .…”

Cancer Hallmarks Define a Continuum of Plastic Cell States between Small Cell Lung Cancer Archetypes

“…Archetypal analysis has been used on systems ranging from cancer to development in order to explore heterogeneous gene expression by finding archetypes, or "pure subtypes," in gene expression space that best explain the heterogeneity seen in the samples. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] Using AA on SCLC cells from cell lines and tumors gives us the flexibility to understand how plastic cells may pass through intermediate states, 26,47 which cannot be described in a discrete-clustering framework, to transition between subtypes.…”

Universal cancer tasks, evolutionary tradeoffs, and the functions of driver mutations

“…Future work can test the present framework at the level of single-cell variation inside a tumor Tirosh et al, 2016;Kim et al, 2018). One prediction, based on concepts from ecology (Schluter, 1996;Sheftel et al, 2018) is called "evolution along lines of least genetic resistance"-the finding that the main axes of variations between individuals in a given species is aligned with variation between species in the same taxon. This predicts, in the case of cancer, that variation between single cells in a tumor will align with variation between different tumors, because of the shared tasks .…”