2022
DOI: 10.3390/jmse10060798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Rates in the Haptophyta: Exploring Molecular and Phenotypic Diversity

Abstract: Haptophytes are photosynthetic protists found in both freshwater and marine environments with an origin possibly dating back to the Neoproterozoic era. The most recent molecular phylogeny reveals several haptophyte “mystery clades” that await morphological verification, but it is otherwise highly consistent with morphology-based phylogenies, including that of the coccolithophores (calcifying haptophytes). The fossil coccolith record offers unique insights into extinct lineages, including the adaptive radiation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
(273 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose, however, that the adaptive morphology of coccoliths, not only cell size, should be considered to decipher the long- (and short-) term evolution of the species of the RGE lineage, and of coccolithophores in general. Our interpretation also echoes the view that the diversity of trophic strategies among coccolithophores is vastly underestimated (Segev et al 2016; Taylor et al 2017; Godrijan et al 2020, 2022; Henderiks et al 2022) and that this diversity underpins the biodiversity of coccolithophores.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We propose, however, that the adaptive morphology of coccoliths, not only cell size, should be considered to decipher the long- (and short-) term evolution of the species of the RGE lineage, and of coccolithophores in general. Our interpretation also echoes the view that the diversity of trophic strategies among coccolithophores is vastly underestimated (Segev et al 2016; Taylor et al 2017; Godrijan et al 2020, 2022; Henderiks et al 2022) and that this diversity underpins the biodiversity of coccolithophores.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Following the Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction, the coccolithophores underwent bursts of diversification, reaching their highest diversity during the early Eocene climatic optimum (EECO). Subsequently, global cooling and associated oceanic eutrophication fueled the diversification and spreading of opportunistic (r-selected) species, leading to an early Oligocene bottleneck of the entirety of coccolithophore diversity (Bown et al 2004; Aubry and Bord 2009; Hannisdal et al 2012; Henderiks et al 2022). While the major K-selected taxonomic groups became sequentially restricted, species of the genus Reticulofenestra increased in abundance, leading to their dominance in the Oligocene coccolithophore communities (Aubry 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of the timeline of speciation from molecular evolution rates poses significant challenges, and unlike diatoms [18], haptophytes [19] and dinoflagellates [20], which have fossil record from the mid-Triassic (240 Myr ago) [21], the lack of fossil data precludes the use of calibration points within Mamiellophyceae and, more generally, within the phylum Chlorophyta [22]. The divergence time between the Monomastigales and the Mamiellales (Table 1) has thus been estimated from the divergence of chloroplast genes to be 1190 [23] and 478 [24] Myr ago, with external calibration points, such as the root of Viridiplantae at 970 Myr and the root of the land plants at 475 Myr ago [24].…”
Section: Timeline Of Speciation and Population Coalescence Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, they are phylogenetically distant and might have different minor element fractionation mechanisms. 16 Secondly, S. apsteinii has an atypically high Sr/Ca ratio (and Sr partitioning coefficient, D Sr ) compared to placolith bearing species such as E. huxleyi, Coccolithus braarudii, and Helicosphaera carteri. 7,12,17,18 This high Sr/ Ca ratio is also observed in C. crassus, the fossil example of uneven Sr distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%