Inferred nutrient forcing on the late middle Eocene to early Oligocene (~40–31 Ma) evolution of the coccolithophore Reticulofenestra (order Isochrysidales)

Abstract

The first size reduction (FSR) in the Reticulofenestra-Gephyrocapsa-Emiliania (RGE) lineage (order Isochrysidales), which occurred in the early Oligocene (~32 Ma), is of great significance for understanding the Lilliput effect that has affected coccolithophore communities from the late Eocene to this day. We conducted a morphologic analysis on the coccoliths of Reticulofenestra species that lived during the late middle Eocene to early Oligocene (~40–31 Ma), using marine sediments from the South Atlantic Ocean. Our data show increasing size and decreasing abundance of the large species during the late Eocene, leading to their disappearance at the FSR, and a concurrent decrease in the size variability of the small- to medium-sized coccoliths whose central opening diameter had become very reduced. Although the cosmopolitan late Paleogene through Neogene size decrease in coccolithophores has been linked to the concomitant long-term decline in global pCO2, we suggest here that the FSR was the result of environmental destabilization caused by the expansion of eutrophic environments following the late Eocene establishment of overturning circulation associated with ice buildup on Antarctica. This study also leads us to propose a hypothetical model that links coccolith morphology of species of the RGE lineage and trophic resources in the upper ocean: the small- to medium-sized, r-selected coccolithophores with smaller coccolith central openings live in nutrient-rich waters where they rely mostly on photosynthesis and little on mixotrophy, whereas the larger, K-selected species with larger coccolith central openings live in oligotrophic waters where they are more dependent on mixotrophy.

Calcareous Nannofossils and Paleoclimatic Evolution Across the Eocene‐Oligocene Transition at IODP Site U1509, Tasman Sea, Southwest Pacific Ocean

“…Reticulofenestra specimens were subdivided into size groups (<4 μm, between 4–10 μm and 10–14 μm) to capture possible differences in the abundance behavior of these subgroups (Figure 3), as changes in coccolith size. This is because changes in size, observed both in recent and fossil taxa, can be linked to environmental variations (e.g., sea‐surface temperatures, pCO 2 , light availability or trophic load) (Finkel et al., 2010; Henderiks & Pagani, 2008; Ma et al., 2023). Additionally, coccolith‐size shifts have been actively driven by selective pressures associated with Cenozoic climate variations (Herrmann & Thierstein, 2012).…”

“…At the base of Interval 3 (250.19-221.41 m), a major positive δ 18 O shift begins (EOIS) at 248.40 m (∼33.8 Ma), roughly coincident with the increase in abundance of C. subdistichus gr., for which the Bc is 33.95 Ma (Viganò et al, 2024a). The base of EOIS has a δ 18 O value of 0.28‰ while the top of this shift (33.66 ± 0.04 Ma;Viganò et al, 2024a)…”