2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary process of household waste separation behavior based on social networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Correspondingly, there are certain penalties for residents and organizations that do not cooperate with this policy. Most of the 46 cities have clarified penalties for illegal discharge of household waste by individuals and organizations, and stipulate that improperly sorted personal waste will be fined 50–200 CNY (7-30 USD) [ 25 ]. It is worth mentioning that the measures that combine rewards and punishments have been implemented to varying degrees in cities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, there are certain penalties for residents and organizations that do not cooperate with this policy. Most of the 46 cities have clarified penalties for illegal discharge of household waste by individuals and organizations, and stipulate that improperly sorted personal waste will be fined 50–200 CNY (7-30 USD) [ 25 ]. It is worth mentioning that the measures that combine rewards and punishments have been implemented to varying degrees in cities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, there are certain penalties for residents and organizations that do not cooperate with this policy. Individuals face a fine of 50–200 CNY (7–30 USD) for not sorting waste properly [ 34 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on MHW separation mainly focused on the principal factors affecting MHW separation and participation behavior, which provided support for decision makers/stakeholders to choose the best scheme. The key factors affecting the behavior of MHW separation and participation include internal factors such as attitude and knowledge (i.e., behavior attitude, environmental awareness, recycling and separation knowledge) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], external factors such as social ties (i.e., families, friends, and neighborhoods) [5,[22][23][24][25][26], facility convenience (i.e., separation facilities, distance to recycling, time costs, facilities) [2,27], economic and policy incentives (i.e., regulations, laws, economic profits, government subsidies) [2,[28][29][30][31], technology (i.e., digital technology, bio-energy technology) [32,33], publicity and education [34], and individual social digital factors (i.e., gender, age, income, educational level, etc.) [35,36].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in practice, levying environmental fees/taxes policies has been promoted. For example, in some communities, if people do not separate MHW, they need to pay MHW fees [20].…”
Section: Environmental Fee Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation