2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2012.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary patterns of hind wing morphology in dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous studies on butterflies, a narrowed wing type is more efficient for flapping low‐level flights . In beetles, only studies regarding the flight morphology and evolution of wings have been performed . Experimental studies on migration that is specifically connected with wing shape adaptations are needed in order to gain a better understanding of flight performance and its influence on invasiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies on butterflies, a narrowed wing type is more efficient for flapping low‐level flights . In beetles, only studies regarding the flight morphology and evolution of wings have been performed . Experimental studies on migration that is specifically connected with wing shape adaptations are needed in order to gain a better understanding of flight performance and its influence on invasiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial warps, which are the eigenvectors of the bending energy matrix ordered, from the thin-plate spline plus the uniform shape components (Rohlf & Bookstein 2003), are a convenient set of shape variables that can be interpreted as axes for this space. Scores on these axes can then be treated as multivariate data representing shape, and can be used in conventional multivariate analyses (Caldecutt & Adams 1998;Bookstein et al 1999;Adams & Rohlf 2000;Bai et al 2010Bai et al , 2011Bai et al , 2012Gharaibeh et al 2000;Klingenberg & Leamy 2001;Rüber & Adams 2001). Differences in shape among objects can be described not only as a plot, but also in tree form via cluster analysis.…”
Section: Geometric Morphometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, relatively few such studies have focused on insects. Prominent exceptions include analyses of wing‐shape divergence to distinguish among closely related species (Villegas, Feliciangeli & Dujardin, ; Gumiel et al ., ; Villemant, Simbolotti & Kenis, ; Francuski et al ., ; Yee, Sheets & Chapman, ; Lee and Lin, ), the analysis of metendosternite variation to infer relationships among higher Scarabaeoidea (Pretorius, Phillips & Scholtz, ; Pretorius & Scholtz, ), the use of wing‐shape variability to show that developmental processes do not control fluctuating asymmetry (Klingenberg & McIntyre, ), the use of relative warp analysis to study intraspecific variation in hymenopteran genital capsules (Querino, Moraes & Zucchi, ), analysis of sexual dimorphism in wings (Pretorius, ; Albutra, Torres & Demayo, ), a study that revealed the taxonomic affinity of halictid bee fossils (Meulemeester et al ., ), and a study that elucidated evolutionary patterns in dung beetle hind wings (Bai et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%