2008 3rd International Workshop on Genetic and Evolving Systems 2008
DOI: 10.1109/gefs.2008.4484566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary many-objective optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
85
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…7. It is clear that the probability decreases rapidly with the increasing number of objectives, and it becomes almost impossible that solutions with more than 12 objectives in a random population can be dominated [35]. It is necessary to note that non-dominated sorting can still determine a few candidate solutions in the combined population unsuitable for surviving for next population in solving MaOPs, which is helpful for promoting population of KnEA to converge to the Pareto fronts.…”
Section: Effectiveness For Many-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. It is clear that the probability decreases rapidly with the increasing number of objectives, and it becomes almost impossible that solutions with more than 12 objectives in a random population can be dominated [35]. It is necessary to note that non-dominated sorting can still determine a few candidate solutions in the combined population unsuitable for surviving for next population in solving MaOPs, which is helpful for promoting population of KnEA to converge to the Pareto fronts.…”
Section: Effectiveness For Many-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though such multi-objective problems are prevalent, it is well known that optimisation problems often comprise a large set of objectives that must be simultaneously optimised [10]. Problems with four or more objectives are often called many-objective problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In di Pierro et al, 2007;Li and Wong, 2009;Sülflow et al, 2007) relations are presented that distinguish between solutions that are incomparable if the Dominates relation is considered. An overview and a comparison of these methods is given in (Corne and Knowles, 2007;Ishibuchi et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Fleming et al, 2005;Corne and Knowles, 2007;Ishibuchi et al, 2008;Brockhoff and Zitzler, 2009;Bader and Zitzler, 2011)). A promising approach in evolutionary many-objective optimization is objective reduction based on the Dominates relation ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%