Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology 1984
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7127-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Epistemology — A Challenge to Science and Philosophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Popper, 1975). Even in this field there are diverse interpretations of this concept: falsificationism by Popper, historicism of changing paradigms by Kuhn, and several others Ð see Hacking (1981) Ð versus evolutionary epistemology as initiated by Lorentz (1965); see also Wuketits (1984). From the more normative, Popperian perspective, rationality of a statement concernig the real world implies its empirical testability and falsifiability (at least in principle).…”
Section: The Concept Of Rationality In Decision Theory and Philosophymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Popper, 1975). Even in this field there are diverse interpretations of this concept: falsificationism by Popper, historicism of changing paradigms by Kuhn, and several others Ð see Hacking (1981) Ð versus evolutionary epistemology as initiated by Lorentz (1965); see also Wuketits (1984). From the more normative, Popperian perspective, rationality of a statement concernig the real world implies its empirical testability and falsifiability (at least in principle).…”
Section: The Concept Of Rationality In Decision Theory and Philosophymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is a theme with a long tradition in philosophy; the closest to our needs is the approach of evolutionary epistemology (e.g. Lorentz, 1965;Wuketits, 1984). An experimental modern field concerned with similar questions is that of cognitive sciences with the dispute over inner representation (e.g.…”
Section: A Thought Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vitalism was one explanation, as an enigmatic force within every live being, considered in different approaches from materialistic (electricity, magnetism) to philosophical (e.g., Bergson ). Finally, vitalism did not survive as a scientific theory, and the idea of intentional behavior as an emerging product of life evolution was the final solution that conciliated causal and intentional explanations (Wuketits ; Monod ).…”
Section: The Crossroads Of Science and Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the microcosmic or macrocosmic aspects-than we succeed in creating new words. Arguments of our mesocosmic perception of the world-see, e.g., Wuketits (1984)-were used to substantiate the opinion that we are imperfect as knowing subjects. I am of opposite opinion: seeing how inadequate our tools are-not only language but also all other tools of cognition, how imperfect are measurement instruments, our computers easily saturated by computational complexity, etc.-we should marvel at our cognitive power.…”
Section: A Rational Theory Of Intuitionmentioning
confidence: 99%