2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.052502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of theN=50Shell Gap Energy towardsNi78

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scalability is a result of the truncation of the model. The results of the calculations for the decay of 82 Ga are very consistent with the initial shell-gap energy of 3.88 MeV, which is compatible with the experimental results from mass measurement by J. Hakala et al [40]. The 83 Zn decay data could point to a somewhat higher gap energy of about 4.2 MeV, but both results could be strongly affected by the choice of the pn interactions between particles in active orbitals and should be a subject for further theoretical work.…”
Section: Gamow-teller Decays Of Zinc and Gallium Isotopessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The scalability is a result of the truncation of the model. The results of the calculations for the decay of 82 Ga are very consistent with the initial shell-gap energy of 3.88 MeV, which is compatible with the experimental results from mass measurement by J. Hakala et al [40]. The 83 Zn decay data could point to a somewhat higher gap energy of about 4.2 MeV, but both results could be strongly affected by the choice of the pn interactions between particles in active orbitals and should be a subject for further theoretical work.…”
Section: Gamow-teller Decays Of Zinc and Gallium Isotopessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Conversely, the evolution of the neutron N ¼ 50 shell closure has been established down to Z ¼ 30 by nuclear mass measurements. The corresponding two-neutron separation energies show a decreasing N ¼ 50 shell gap from Z ¼ 40 to Z ¼ 32 and a subsequent increase in Z ¼ 30; 31 [16,17]. If the increasing trend observed below Z ¼ 32 was retained, an enhanced N ¼ 50 shell-gap energy relative to neighboring isotopic chains is expected at Z ¼ 28, forming a robust neutron shell closure in 78 Ni [16,18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The corresponding two-neutron separation energies show a decreasing N ¼ 50 shell gap from Z ¼ 40 to Z ¼ 32 and a subsequent increase in Z ¼ 30; 31 [16,17]. If the increasing trend observed below Z ¼ 32 was retained, an enhanced N ¼ 50 shell-gap energy relative to neighboring isotopic chains is expected at Z ¼ 28, forming a robust neutron shell closure in 78 Ni [16,18]. Despite these extensive studies, the doubly magic character of 78 Ni has not been verified experimentally, especially for the proton shell magicity in 78 Ni.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other side of the nuclear chart, the most neutron-rich selenium and germanium isotopes accessible for experiments are around the magic neutron number N = 50. Considerable experimental and theoretical efforts have recently been focused in this region on the investigation of the shell structure approaching the doubly magic nucleus 78 Ni (see, e.g., [14][15][16][17][18]). The description of nuclei in this region poses a challenge for shell-model calculations since the full pf shell and the neutron g 9/2 intruder orbital would be needed with the corresponding effective interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%