Evolution of the Cultural Trade Network in “the Belt and Road” Region: Implication for Global Cultural Sustainability

Abstract

While there has been increasing concern with respect to the sustainable development of “the Belt and Road” region, the majority of studies have focused on economic and environmental dimensions. This paper focuses on the temporal cultural trade network between the 66 countries of this region between 1990 and 2016. A social network analysis method was used to analyze the cultural trade network and its temporal evolution, where results detected key nodes and cultural corridors. Furthermore, the conceptual point-line-polygon model, which summarizes the expansion of such cultural nodes and corridors between 1990 and 2016, reveals the rapid development of cultural exchanges within the region. Here, the varied roles of large and small-sized countries were found to be dominated by China, Russia, and India. While the cultural trade network has promoted the integration of cultural diversity into the global market, to achieve global cultural sustainability more active trading relations with small-sized countries should be encouraged.

Evaluating waste and scrap trade risks in Belt and Road Initiative countries

“…Later, international trade networks based on specific commodities among BRI countries were also explored, such as the petroleum trade (Zhang et al, 2019), the agricultural products trade (Liu et al, 2019), the virtual water trade (Qian et al, 2019), and the temporal cultural trade (Chen et al, 2019).…”

Belt & Road Initiative in Times of ‘Synchronized Downturn’: Issues, Challenges, Opportunities

“…Research in this regard remains fragmented and highly context-specific, and efforts are thus underway to obtain a better overview. As the potential of international cooperation is clear [200,201], there are calls to introduce international organizations to link spatial scales [121] or Multinational Development Banks [202]. In terms of the NSR, multi-level governance can serve as a means to foster the stepwise integration of regions into global processes and networks, and to include local conditions and requirements.…”

Comparative Studies on Trade and Value‐Added Trade along the “Belt and Road”: A Network Analysis

“…On this basis, Chong et al [18] discussed the forming factors and influence of proximity, culture, and institutions on the structure of the BRI trade network. Chen et al [19] further analyzed the cultural trade network of the BRI countries and its evolution. Incorporating the BRI trade network into the global trade network, Song et al [20,21] compared the topological structure of the BRI trade network with that of the global trade network and sorted out the relationship between the trade communities in the BRI trade network and those in the global trade network.…”