2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-018-0349-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of seismic hazard maps in Turkey

Abstract: A review on the historical evolution of seismic hazard maps in Turkey is followed by summarizing the important aspects of the updated national probabilistic seismic hazard maps. Comparisons with the predecessor probabilistic seismic hazard maps as well as the implications on the national design codes conclude the paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
21
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismic risk assessments have been made in previous studies (e.g. Demircioğlu et al, 2017;Akkar et al 2018) and the region between the NEAF and the NAF in the south of the Eastern Pontides was assessed in the medium to high risk group.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Seismic Activity Of The Eastern Pontidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic risk assessments have been made in previous studies (e.g. Demircioğlu et al, 2017;Akkar et al 2018) and the region between the NEAF and the NAF in the south of the Eastern Pontides was assessed in the medium to high risk group.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Seismic Activity Of The Eastern Pontidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In green: negative amplifications. Figure 28 presents a comparison of the 475-year PGA distribution of our Poisson model with the mean 475-year PGA from the updated PSHA model of Turkey [71][72][73]. It would be difficult to provide a full description of the source modelling in the latter; however, we may say that the new Turkish seismic hazard model is composed of two independent source models, an area source model (assigned 50% weight in the final logic tree) and fault source and smoothed seismicity model (again weighted as 50% in the final logic tree).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Results And Comparisons With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the evaluation of regional earthquake ground motion recordings and statistical ground motion prediction equation (GMPE) selection methods, [70] proposed an up-to-date logic tree for the characterisation of the ground motion in Turkey, which was later used in the update of the Turkish national seismic hazard maps [71][72][73]. As the main focus of the present study is an update of the source characterization in the Marmara region, we adopt for all source models (fault and background) the GMPE logic tree proposed by [70] for active shallow crustal regions, which consists of four models and associated weights as presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Ground Motion Characterisation and Logic Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deprem tasarım yüklerinin hesaplanmasında 1990'lı yılların sonlarına kadar deprem bölgeleri yaklaşımının dünya genelinde yaygın olarak kullanıldığı bilinmektedir [2]. Son zamanlarda bu yaklaşımın aksayan bazı yönlerinin olduğu görülmektedir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Bu çalışmalar hakkında özet bilgi içeren ve ilgili çalışmaların tümüne atıf yapan Akkar vd. [2] konu ile ilgili ayrıntılı bilgi edinmek için incelenebilir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified