2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2016.7749582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of oxide disruptions: The (W)hole story about poly-Si/c-Si passivating contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure , the in‐diffusion of phosphorus increased in accordance with an increase in the annealing time for both poly‐Si passivating contacts. This indicates that the deterioration of the lifetime could be due to the phosphorus in‐diffusion into substrate . In addition, when compared with the POCl 3 ‐doped poly‐Si and in situ P‐doped poly‐Si, the in situ P‐doped poly‐Si exhibited a lower in‐diffusion and higher doping concentration within the poly‐Si layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure , the in‐diffusion of phosphorus increased in accordance with an increase in the annealing time for both poly‐Si passivating contacts. This indicates that the deterioration of the lifetime could be due to the phosphorus in‐diffusion into substrate . In addition, when compared with the POCl 3 ‐doped poly‐Si and in situ P‐doped poly‐Si, the in situ P‐doped poly‐Si exhibited a lower in‐diffusion and higher doping concentration within the poly‐Si layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A) Effective lifetime and (B) sheet resistance of in situ P-doped poly-Si and POCl 3 -doped poly-Si (the lifetimes were determined using quasi-steady-state photoconductivity [QSSPC] at an intensity of 1 sun) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary. com]of the lifetime could be due to the phosphorus in-diffusion into substrate [47][48][49][50][51]. In addition, when compared with the POCl 3 -doped poly-Si and in situ P-doped poly-Si, the in situ P-doped poly-Si exhibited a lower in-diffusion and higher doping concentration within the poly-Si layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was suggested that both mechanisms possibly superimpose in real junctions, in particular for the case of interfacial oxides with thicknesses d ox < 1.5 nm formed by wet-chemical or ozone oxidation. 16 Experimentally, the existence of pinholes-also in samples with good passivation quality-has been verified by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) 17 and by selective etching of the poly-Si from the interfacial oxide after junction formation. 18 For samples with interfacial oxide thicknesses in excess of 2 nm, the etch pit density is in excellent agreement with the pinhole areal density as predicted by the pinhole model for the measured J 0 , ρ C values and doping profiles of the same samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The SiO x layer is generally thin enough (<2 nm) to allow a transport by tunneling. However, it has been shown that the SiO x integrity is altered upon annealing leading to the hypothesis of a direct transport through pinholes within the SiO x layer . Recent studies focus on the detection of pinholes through SiO x layer, notably by means of conductive Atomic Force Microscopy (C‐AFM) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%