2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of low molecular weight organic compounds during ultrapure water production process: A pilot-scale study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and lower molecular weight substances (methanol, isopropanol, etc.) [87], solution diffusion and the surface charge (zeta potential) of the membrane and pollutant play a key role in separation. Due to their varying length and charge, the removal of PFAS by NF is described in the literature by multiple mechanisms, including: Steric (size) exclusion-rejection depends on the molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of the membrane and dominates throughout the separation process.…”
Section: Membrane Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and lower molecular weight substances (methanol, isopropanol, etc.) [87], solution diffusion and the surface charge (zeta potential) of the membrane and pollutant play a key role in separation. Due to their varying length and charge, the removal of PFAS by NF is described in the literature by multiple mechanisms, including: Steric (size) exclusion-rejection depends on the molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of the membrane and dominates throughout the separation process.…”
Section: Membrane Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it has been reported that urea cannot be effectively removed by ion-exchange method because of its non-ionic structure (MacKeown et al 2021). The conventional UPW production process (Figure 1), with membrane filtration, ion-exchange adsorption, and ultraviolet (UV) mineralization as the primary units to remove TOC, had unsatisfactory effects on urea removal (Zhang et al 2021;Wang et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, electronic-grade UPW is purified using multiple steps including reverse osmosis (RO) filtration, activated carbon adsorption, UV oxidation, and ion exchange resin adsorption. RO filtration and activated carbon adsorption remove most organic and inorganic components, , but they cannot efficiently eliminate neutrally charged and low-molecular-weight (LMW) organics. , For example, only a portion of methanol, isopropyl alcohol, formaldehyde, and acetone is removed by RO filtration. , The presence of these residual LMW organics makes it difficult to achieve the TOC requirements of electronic-grade UPW. Thus, subsequent treatment steps are needed, such as UV oxidation (e.g., 185 nm vacuum-UV oxidation) and anion exchange resin (AER) adsorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%