Ophthalmology 2009
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-04332-8.00058-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Intraocular Lens Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Today, there are numerous commercially available IOLs composed of materials such as acrylic, silicone or hydrogel. 2 Despite continuous manufacturing improvements and rigorous biocompatibility tests, late structural deterioration of these lenses' materials is still a dreadful and unpredictable occurrence. One such example is IOL opacification, a rare phenomenon first described in the early 90s, consisting of loss of optical clarity of the IOL's biomaterials and, consequently, marked decline of the visual functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, there are numerous commercially available IOLs composed of materials such as acrylic, silicone or hydrogel. 2 Despite continuous manufacturing improvements and rigorous biocompatibility tests, late structural deterioration of these lenses' materials is still a dreadful and unpredictable occurrence. One such example is IOL opacification, a rare phenomenon first described in the early 90s, consisting of loss of optical clarity of the IOL's biomaterials and, consequently, marked decline of the visual functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the attempt to optimize visual and anatomic outcomes, multiple IOL materials and designs have been introduced, such as hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone [ 20 ]. Nevertheless, opacification has been observed with all of them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%