1996
DOI: 10.1006/viro.1996.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Canine Parvovirus Involved Loss and Gain of Feline Host Range

Abstract: Canine parvovirus (CPV) type-2 emerged as a new virus infecting dogs in 1978, and it was probably derived as a variant of feline panleukopenia virus or of a closely related virus infecting another carnivore. CPV type-2 was subsequently replaced in nature by antigenically variant viruses (CPV type-2a and CPV type-2b) which now coexist in dog populations worldwide. We show that CPV type-2 isolates did not replicate in cats, but that both CPV type-2a and CPV type-2b isolates replicated efficiently. About 10% of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

9
197
1
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
197
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible reason for this observation could be contact and natural exposure of domestic cats with canine parvovirus (CPV). CPV infection in dogs is very common in Costa Rica, and as described elsewhere, the canine agent shares several antigens with FPV that could cross-react in serological tests [17,18]. The prevalences of FeLV and FIV determined for the domestic cats of Costa Rica are similar to those reported in Guatemala and Czech Republic [12,14].…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Another possible reason for this observation could be contact and natural exposure of domestic cats with canine parvovirus (CPV). CPV infection in dogs is very common in Costa Rica, and as described elsewhere, the canine agent shares several antigens with FPV that could cross-react in serological tests [17,18]. The prevalences of FeLV and FIV determined for the domestic cats of Costa Rica are similar to those reported in Guatemala and Czech Republic [12,14].…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Residues 80, 564, and 568 are also in the shoulder region, and changes at these sites are thought to be responsible for the loss of the feline host range in CPV2 (5). Whereas CPV2 can infect feline cells in tissue culture, it cannot infect cats unless residues 80, 564, and 568 revert to their FPLV identity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strain XJ-1 was a FPLV isolate from the feces of a diseased cat. The nucle- Although further information on this isolate is not available at present, it may be that strain XJ-1 was generated by a recombination event between FPLV and new CPV-2b in a Chinese cat, possibly when CPV superinfected the cat already infected with FPLV, or vice versa, since new CPV2a and 2b viruses can infect cats [19,35]. As in the case of influenza A viruses, it may be essential for such recombination that two, or more, animal species harboring viruses make frequent contact with each other in a given setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%