2017
DOI: 10.4000/educationdidactique.2845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Évolution de l’activité d’enseignement au cours de l’année : analyse à partir de la théorie de la conceptualisation dans l’action

Abstract: Tous droits réservés The evolution in teaching practice over a schoolyear: a studybased on the theory of conceptualization in action Mots-clés : activité d'enseignement, conceptualisation dans l'action, modèle opératif de l'enseignant, groupe de pilotage, hétérogénéité des élèves.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have seen that classroom interactions lead the teacher to categorize his/her students by profiles according to their reaction to authority, and their difficulties, by identifying students as “thermometers” of the classroom climate. These results are in line with work showing that the interactions of teachers take place according to the categorizations he/she makes of the students in the class, such as “steering criterion groups” (Dahllöf, 1971 ; Lefeuvre and Murillo, 2017 ). These works analyzing teacher–student interactions show that teachers decide and regulate their actions primarily on the basis of the behavior and reactions of a group of a few students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have seen that classroom interactions lead the teacher to categorize his/her students by profiles according to their reaction to authority, and their difficulties, by identifying students as “thermometers” of the classroom climate. These results are in line with work showing that the interactions of teachers take place according to the categorizations he/she makes of the students in the class, such as “steering criterion groups” (Dahllöf, 1971 ; Lefeuvre and Murillo, 2017 ). These works analyzing teacher–student interactions show that teachers decide and regulate their actions primarily on the basis of the behavior and reactions of a group of a few students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On the other hand, if they show signs of misunderstanding and loss of contact, teachers reduce their pace and modify their presentation. This construction of knowledge about the classroom by the teacher is an economical strategy, because these steering groups summarize information about the impact of the action of teachers (Dahllöf, 1971 ; Durand, 1996 ; Lefeuvre and Murillo, 2017 ). The same is true for the students studied who categorize their teacher as authoritarian, supportive, or moody.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coupler les méthodes d'analyse du travail issues de l'ergonomie francophone(Leplat, 1997) avec la théorie des « schèmes » deVergnaud (1996), appelée aussi « conceptualisation dans l'action ».Les recherches conduites selon cette perspective dans le domaine de l'enseignement sont assez récentes(Grangeat et Munoz, 2006 ; Numa-Bocage, Clauzard etPastré, 2012 ;Lefeuvre et Murillo, 2017 ;Vinatier, 2009). Bien que les orientations soient différentes toutes mobilisent le couple notionnel de schème-situation(Vinatier, 2013).Le schème est défini comme « une organisation invariante de la conduite dans une classe de situations donnée »(Vergnaud, 1996, p. 283).…”
unclassified