2008
DOI: 10.1179/136485908x300823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence supporting the zoonotic and non-zoonotic transmission ofEnterocytozoon bieneusi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previously published ITS phylogenies (Drosten et al, 2005), UD values smaller than 1 indicate partial segregation by host. This conclusion was also inferred by others on the basis of sequence comparisons (Cama et al, 2007; Dengjel et al, 2001; Leelayoova et al, 2008; Mathis et al, 2005; Santin et al, 2005; Sulaiman et al, 2004). Recently, Ten Hove and co-workers found that in a group of 57 isolates from the Netherlands and Malawi ITS sequences isolated from pigs and cattle formed separate clusters, and that E. bieneusi from immunosuppressed individuals shared the ITS genotype C (ten Hove et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Consistent with previously published ITS phylogenies (Drosten et al, 2005), UD values smaller than 1 indicate partial segregation by host. This conclusion was also inferred by others on the basis of sequence comparisons (Cama et al, 2007; Dengjel et al, 2001; Leelayoova et al, 2008; Mathis et al, 2005; Santin et al, 2005; Sulaiman et al, 2004). Recently, Ten Hove and co-workers found that in a group of 57 isolates from the Netherlands and Malawi ITS sequences isolated from pigs and cattle formed separate clusters, and that E. bieneusi from immunosuppressed individuals shared the ITS genotype C (ten Hove et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%