1997
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1997.446.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Xenia in Blueberry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The knowledge of metaxenia is very important for planning commercial plantings of blueberry. According to Gupton, 1997, the time of harvest and the fruit development period has even larger pollen influence than the fruit weight. The phenomenon of xenia as already said can be considered as the effect of pollen on the embryo and endosperm, altering the genetic characteristics and providing qualitative and quantitative changes (ANDRADE; PEREIRA, 2005), these features, manifested in the generation of the parent plant (MERCER et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge of metaxenia is very important for planning commercial plantings of blueberry. According to Gupton, 1997, the time of harvest and the fruit development period has even larger pollen influence than the fruit weight. The phenomenon of xenia as already said can be considered as the effect of pollen on the embryo and endosperm, altering the genetic characteristics and providing qualitative and quantitative changes (ANDRADE; PEREIRA, 2005), these features, manifested in the generation of the parent plant (MERCER et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many years ago, Swingle (1928) proposed that hormones produced by the seeds are responsible for the changes. Pollinizer effects on some traits were previously demonstrated in almond (Garc ıa-Gusano et al 2005;Gonz alez et al 2005;Sanchez-Perez et al 2012), apple (Ruth & Williams 1983;T oth et al 2005;Bodor et al 2008), blueberry (Gupton 1997;da Silveira et al 2011), chestnut (McKay & Crane 1939, cucumber (Olfati et al 2010), date palm (Swingle 1928;Muhtaseb & Ghanim 2006), grapefruit (Burger 1985), guava (Usman et al 2013), litchi (Degani et al 1995), loquat (Xu et al 2007), pear (Tufts & Hansen 1933;Nyeki 1972), pistachio (Crane & Iwakiri 1980), pecan (Marquard 1988), olive (Farinelli et al 2012), sour cherry (Ansari et al 2010), walnut (Golzari et al 2010) and watermelon (Freeman et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There exists a name-reagent, Gold's reagent 134. Remarkably it does not contain the element gold; it is a stoichiometric ␤-dimethylaminomethylenating agent for ketones like 135 (to yield 136) or amines (92,93), Figure 50.…”
Section: Figure 49mentioning
confidence: 99%