2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-018-2058-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of the sternalis muscle in two South African cadavers

Abstract: The sternalis muscle is an infrequent, non-pathological anatomical variant typically misrepresented in a clinical context. It presents with 3-8% prevalence, according to cadaveric studies. The muscles were identified during routine cadaver prosection at the School of Anatomical Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand. Here, we report two cases of the sternalis muscle in two South African White cadavers. Analysis of the sternalis muscles revealed unilaterally present, distinctly defined muscle masses on the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sternalis muscle occupies position between the superficial fascia and the pectoral fascia [40]. Different variants of the sternalis muscle were described in medical literature [2, 32, 40, 41]. In our study we found one case of unilateral presence of the sternalis muscle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sternalis muscle occupies position between the superficial fascia and the pectoral fascia [40]. Different variants of the sternalis muscle were described in medical literature [2, 32, 40, 41]. In our study we found one case of unilateral presence of the sternalis muscle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Our case may be classified as a “simple type” according to Snosek et al [40] classification system. Davimes et al [41] suggest that the sternalis muscle may be misinterpreted as a “pathological mass or lesion”; thus clinicians should be aware of this variation during diagnostic procedures. There were also described cases of “duplicity” of the PM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the articles included, four (18.18%) were randomized studies [1,5,6,11] 12 (54.54%) were case reports [2,3,[7][8][9][10][12][13][14]17,18,20],…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies based on various imaging modalities and surgical procedures showed a prevalence of 0.6%, yet, mammographs showed a prevalence of 0.02%, while studies using multi-detector CT showed 6.4% prevalence. As to complete the literature review until 2020, we have summarized the published data related to the prevalence of SM in populations since 2014 (Table 5) [6,13,[24][25][26][27], in our review we have used pubmed and google scholar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%